CVE-2026-33464
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user holding a low-privileged role can submit a specially crafted, oversized payload to an internal Kibana API, causing the Kibana process to exhaust available resources and become unresponsive to all users until the service recovers or is restarted.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn authenticated user with low-privileged role can send a specially crafted oversized payload to an internal Kibana API endpoint, causing uncontrolled resource consumption that exhausts available memory/CPU and renders the entire Kibana instance unresponsive to all users until restart or recovery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.19.16>= 9.0.0, < 9.3.5= 9.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Kibana versionRun 'kibana --version' or check the Kibana home page, or query the /api/status endpointAffected if The version falls within >= 8.0.0 and < 8.19.16, OR >= 9.0.0 and < 9.3.5, OR equals 9.4.0
-
Verify low-privileged users existQuery Kibana security API (/_security/user) or check user management settings for any users assigned roles below 'editor' or 'admin' levelAffected if There are users with low-privileged roles such as 'viewer', 'monitoring_user', or custom roles with limited permissions
-
Confirm internal API accessibilityCheck Kibana configuration file (kibana.yml) for 'server.internalApi' settings and review network policies restricting access to internal endpointsAffected if Internal API endpoints are accessible to authenticated low-privileged users without additional restrictions
-
Check for resource exhaustion indicatorsMonitor Kibana process memory usage (top/ps), node.js heap usage, and CPU utilization. Review Kibana logs for out-of-memory errors or slow request warningsAffected if Kibana process shows unusually high memory consumption, frequent GC pauses, or logs indicate resource exhaustion from API requests
Environment is affected if running a vulnerable Kibana version AND has low-privileged users with access to internal APIs, with observable or historical signs of resource exhaustion from oversized payloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.169.3.5
Implement input validation and size limits on internal Kibana APIs, enforce proper authorization checks to restrict low-privileged users from accessing sensitive internal endpoints, and consider rate limiting to prevent excessive resource allocation attacks.
Upgrade to Kibana 8.19.16 (for 8.x line) or 9.3.5/9.4.1 (for 9.x line)
- 1. Backup your current Kibana configuration and any custom dashboards or visualizations.
- 2. Ensure your Elasticsearch cluster is running a compatible version that matches your target Kibana version.
- 3. Stop the Kibana service: `sudo systemctl stop kibana` (or equivalent for your setup).
- 4. Upgrade Kibana to version 8.19.16 (for 8.x installations) or 9.3.5/9.4.1 (for 9.x installations). Use your package manager or download from https://www.elastic.co/downloads/kibana.
- 5. Verify the integrity of the downloaded package using GPG signatures provided by Elastic.
- 6. Start the Kibana service: `sudo systemctl start kibana`.
- 7. Confirm Kibana starts successfully and is responsive: check service status and attempt to access the web interface.
- 8. Verify that existing dashboards, visualizations, and saved objects are intact.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33464 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33464 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data