CVE-2026-33614
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a SQL injection vulnerability in the getinfo endpoint by injecting malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input in a SELECT query, potentially allowing extraction of all data in the connected database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.19.4<= 2.19.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionLocate the Mbconnect24 or MyMbconnect24 application and check its version number, typically found in the application settings, about page, or installation directoryAffected if The version is Mbconnect24 <= 2.19.4 or MyMbconnect24 <= 2.19.4
-
Verify the getinfo endpoint existsLocate the web interface or API endpoint for the application and confirm the /getinfo or getinfo endpoint is accessible, typically at a URL path like /api/getinfo or similarAffected if The getinfo endpoint is present and reachable over the network
-
Check if the getinfo endpoint accepts user inputReview the application's web routes or API documentation to confirm the getinfo endpoint accepts parameters that could be passed to a database SELECT queryAffected if The getinfo endpoint accepts query parameters that are used in database queries without sanitization
-
Confirm unauthenticated access is possibleTest accessing the getinfo endpoint without providing any authentication credentials to see if the request is processedAffected if The getinfo endpoint can be accessed without authentication and processes requests
-
Inspect database query implementationIf source code or configuration is available, examine the getinfo endpoint handler to verify whether user-supplied input is directly concatenated into SQL SELECT statements without using parameterized queries or prepared statementsAffected if User input is directly embedded into SQL queries without proper parameterization
The environment is affected if Mbconnect24 or MyMbconnect24 version 2.19.4 or lower is installed and the getinfo endpoint accepts unsanitized user input in SQL queries without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database queries in the getinfo endpoint to properly neutralize special SQL characters in user input.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33614 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33614 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data