OutlineApplication · Getoutline

CVE-2026-33640

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Outline implements an Email OTP login flow for users not associated with an Identity Provider. Starting in version 0.86.0 and prior to version 1.6.0, Outline does not invalidate OTP codes based on amount or frequency of invalid submissions, rather it relies on the rate limiter to restrict attempts. Consequently, identified bypasses in the rate limiter permit unrestricted OTP code submissions within the codes lifetime. This allows attackers to perform brute force attacks which enable account takeover. Version 1.6.0 fixes the issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Outline's Email OTP authentication flow does not invalidate OTP codes after a threshold of invalid submissions, relying solely on a rate limiter that can be bypassed. This allows attackers to perform unlimited brute force attempts within the OTP's validity window, enabling account takeover.

MitigationUpgrade to Outline version 1.6.0 or later, which implements OTP code invalidation based on the number of invalid submission attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OutlineApplication
Affected:>= 0.86.0, < 1.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Outline version
    Determine the running version of Outline (e.g., via admin UI, API endpoint, package.json, or Docker image tag). Compare it to the affected range: >= 0.86.0 and < 1.6.0.
    Affected if The installed version falls within >= 0.86.0 and < 1.6.0
  2. Verify Email OTP authentication is enabled
    Confirm that Email OTP is configured as an authentication method in the Outline instance (check authentication settings in admin panel or configuration files).
    Affected if Email OTP authentication is enabled in the environment
  3. Confirm rate limiter behavior
    Test the OTP submission endpoint to determine if the rate limiter can be bypassed or allows unlimited attempts within the OTP validity window.
    Affected if The rate limiter does not block or invalidate OTP codes after multiple failed attempts, allowing unlimited brute force attempts

The environment is affected if running Outline version >= 0.86.0 and < 1.6.0 with Email OTP authentication enabled, and the rate limiter can be bypassed to allow unlimited OTP submission attempts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.6.0 or later
Fixed in 1.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Outline version 1.6.0 or later, which implements OTP code invalidation based on the number of invalid submission attempts.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.6.0

  1. Verify current Outline version by checking the running container or application metadata
  2. Review the Outline upgrade documentation for your deployment method (Docker, Kubernetes, etc.)
  3. Back up the Outline database and configuration files before upgrading
  4. Pull the updated Outline 1.6.0 container image or download the new release
  5. Stop the current Outline instance
  6. Apply the upgrade following Outlines official upgrade procedure
  7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version
  8. Test the Email OTP login flow to confirm the fix is working
Caveat Review the Outline 1.6.0 release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and 1.6.0; major version upgrades may include database migrations or configuration changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Outline Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33640 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33640 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data