JupyterhubApplication · Jupyter

CVE-2026-33709

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.4.4 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
JupyterHub is software that allows one to create a multi-user server for Jupyter notebooks. Prior to version 5.4.4, an open redirect vulnerability in JupyterHub allows attackers to construct links which, when clicked, take users to the JupyterHub login page, after which they are sent to an arbitrary attacker-controlled site outside JupyterHub instead of a JupyterHub page, bypassing JupyterHub's check to prevent this. This issue has been patched in version 5.4.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

JupyterHub prior to version 5.4.4 contains an open redirect vulnerability in its authentication flow. Attackers can craft malicious URLs that initially direct users to the JupyterHub login page, but after successful authentication, redirect them to an attacker-controlled external website, bypassing JupyterHub's built-in redirect validation checks.

MitigationUpgrade JupyterHub to version 5.4.4 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement URL allow-listing or network-level controls to restrict redirect destinations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JupyterhubApplication
Affected:< 5.4.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed JupyterHub version
    Run 'jupyterhub --version' or check the package version via your package manager (e.g., pip show jupyterhub, conda list jupyterhub, or helm list for Kubernetes deployments)
    Affected if The version displayed is lower than 5.4.4 (e.g., 5.4.3, 5.4.0, 5.0.0, etc.)
  2. Verify JupyterHub is configured with authentication
    Check your jupyterhub_config.py file for auth-related settings (e.g., c.Authenticator.class, c.JupyterHub.authenticator_class) or inspect whether users are required to log in
    Affected if Authentication is enabled and users go through the login flow, which is the default configuration
  3. Identify login redirect configuration
    Search your jupyterhub_config.py for 'redirect' or 'next' parameters (e.g., c.JupyterHub.default_url, any custom redirect_after_login settings)
    Affected if Any custom redirect URL configuration exists that could be exploited, or if using default settings without explicit allowlisting

Your environment is affected if JupyterHub version is below 5.4.4 and user authentication via the login flow is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.4.4 or later
Fixed in 5.4.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade JupyterHub to version 5.4.4 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement URL allow-listing or network-level controls to restrict redirect destinations.

Recommended fix High confidence

5.4.4 or later (latest stable release)

  1. 1. Identify current JupyterHub version by checking the running deployment or package management system
  2. 2. Upgrade JupyterHub to version 5.4.4 or later (preferably the latest stable release)
  3. 3. Restart the JupyterHub service to apply the update
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version matches or exceeds 5.4.4

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jupyterhub Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33709 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data