CVE-2026-33712
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTypebot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions 3.15.2 and prior, the preview chat endpoint (POST /api/v1/typebots/{typebotId}/preview/startChat) allows unauthenticated users to achieve Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by supplying a custom typebot definition with server-side code blocks. The fetch function exposed inside the isolated-vm sandbox calls Node.js native fetch without the SSRF validation (validateHttpReqUrl) that protects the HTTP Request block. This bypasses all SSRF mitigations added after GHSA-8gq9-rw7v-3jpr. Exploitation of this unauthenticated SSRF vulnerability can lead to cloud credential theft, internal network access and data exfiltration for any self-hosted Typebot deployments and hosted services. This issue has been fixed in version 3.16.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTypebot versions 3.15.2 and prior have an unauthenticated SSRF vulnerability in the preview chat endpoint (POST /api/v1/typebots/{typebotId}/preview/startChat). Attackers can supply custom typebot definitions with server-side code blocks that leverage the fetch function inside an isolated-vm sandbox. This fetch calls Node.js native fetch directly without the validateHttpReqUrl SSRF validation that protects the HTTP Request block, bypassing all SSRF mitigations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine your Typebot versionLocate the running Typebot instance and identify its installed version number (typically visible in package.json, docker image tag, or the application's admin UI footer)Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.16.0 (the patched release)
-
Verify unauthenticated access to the preview endpointAttempt a POST request to /api/v1/typebots/{anyTypebotId}/preview/startChat without providing authentication credentials (no JWT, session cookie, or API key)Affected if The endpoint returns a successful response (200 OK) rather than rejecting the request with 401/403
-
Check if custom typebot definitions are acceptedSend a POST request to the preview endpoint with a crafted payload containing a typebot definition that includes server-side code blocks (look for 'code' blocks with JavaScript content)Affected if The server accepts and processes the custom definition without validation, allowing code block execution
-
Confirm isolated-vm sandbox is in useInspect the Typebot server's dependencies or configuration to verify the 'isolated-vm' package is installed and active for code execution featuresAffected if isolated-vm is present and the preview endpoint allows code blocks to execute fetch calls
A user is affected if their Typebot installation is below version 3.16.0 AND the /preview/startChat endpoint is accessible without authentication, allowing execution of custom typebot definitions with code blocks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Typebot version 3.16.0 or later, which contains the fix. For deployments where immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable the preview chat endpoint or implement network-level restrictions to prevent outgoing connections from the Typebot server.
3.16.0
- 1. Identify all self-hosted Typebot deployments running version 3.15.2 or prior
- 2. Plan the upgrade to version 3.16.0 during a maintenance window
- 3. Backup the current database and configuration files
- 4. Stop the Typebot service
- 5. Upgrade Typebot to version 3.16.0
- 6. Verify the upgrade by checking the version number in the admin interface
- 7. Test the /api/v1/typebots/{typebotId}/preview/startChat endpoint to confirm SSRF validation is now applied
- 8. Restart the Typebot service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33712 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33712 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data