CVE-2026-33728
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unediteddd-trace-java is a Datadog APM client for Java. In versions of dd-trace-java 0.40.0 through prior to 1.60.2, the RMI instrumentation registered a custom endpoint that deserialized incoming data without applying serialization filters. On JDK version 16 and earlier, an attacker with network access to a JMX or RMI port on an instrumented JVM could exploit this to potentially achieve remote code execution. All three of the following conditions must be true to exploit this vulnerability: First, dd-trace-java is attached as a Java agent (`-javaagent`) on Java 16 or earlier. Second, a JMX/RMI port has been explicitly configured via `-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port` and is network-reachable, Third, a gadget-chain-compatible library is present on the classpath. For JDK >= 17, no action is required, but upgrading is strongly encouraged. For JDK >= 8u121 < JDK 17, upgrade to dd-trace-java version 1.60.3 or later. For JDK < 8u121 and earlier where serialization filters are not available, apply the workaround. The workaround is to set the following environment variable to disable the RMI integration: `DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED=false`.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencedd-trace-java versions 0.40.0 through 1.60.2 have a deserialization vulnerability in the RMI instrumentation. The custom RMI endpoint deserializes incoming data without applying serialization filters, allowing remote code execution on JDK 16 and earlier when JMX/RMI ports are network-accessible and a gadget-chain-compatible library exists on the classpath.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 0.40.0, < 1.60.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify dd-trace-java versionLocate the dd-trace-java library in your application classpath or dependency management system (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build file, or JAR manifest). Check the version number.Affected if The installed version falls within 0.40.0 through 1.60.2 (inclusive).
-
Verify JDK versionRun `java -version` or check the JAVA_HOME environment variable to determine the JDK version in use.Affected if The JDK is version 16 or earlier.
-
Confirm RMI integration is enabledCheck for the environment variable DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED or any configuration that enables the RMI instrumentation. If not set, the default is typically enabled.Affected if DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED is not set to false, or the RMI integration is explicitly enabled.
-
Assess network exposure of JMX/RMI portsReview your network configuration and firewall rules to determine if JMX/RMI ports (typically port 9010, 9011, or dynamic RMI ports) are accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if JMX/RMI ports are exposed to network-accessible interfaces rather than localhost only.
Your environment is affected if you have dd-trace-java version 0.40.0-1.60.2 running on JDK 16 or earlier with the RMI integration enabled and network-accessible JMX/RMI ports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.60.3
Upgrade dd-trace-java to version 1.60.3 or later for JDK 8u121 through JDK 16; for older JDK versions, set DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED=false to disable the vulnerable RMI integration.
dd-trace-java version 1.60.3 or later
- Upgrade dd-trace-java to version 1.60.3 or later by updating your build configuration (Maven/Gradle) or the javaagent JAR file
- If using JDK < 8u121 where serialization filters are unavailable as an additional precaution, set the environment variable DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED=false to disable the RMI integration
- Restart the JVM to apply the changes
- Verify the application starts successfully and APM functionality is working as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,608.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33728 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33728 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data