CVE-2026-33782
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series, allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker to cause a memory leak, that will eventually cause a complete Denial-of-Service (DoS). In a DHCPv6 over PPPoE, or DHCPv6 over VLAN with Active lease query or Bulk lease query scenario, every subscriber logout will leak a small amount of memory. When all available memory has been exhausted, jdhcpd will crash and restart which causes a complete service impact until the process has recovered. The memory usage of jdhcpd can be monitored with: user@host> show system processes extensive | match jdhcpd This issue affects Junos OS: * all versions before 22.4R3-S1, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in the DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Junos OS on MX Series. In DHCPv6 over PPPoE or DHCPv6 over VLAN configurations with Active or Bulk lease query enabled, each subscriber logout fails to release allocated memory. Over time, this causes jdhcpd memory usage to grow until the process exhausts all available memory, crashes, and restarts, resulting in complete service disruption until recovery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.4= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is MX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' and verify the device model is an MX Series routerAffected if Device is not an MX Series - the vulnerability only affects MX Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and compare the installed version against affected ranges: versions < 22.4, = 22.4, = 23.2, = 23.4Affected if Version matches < 22.4, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4 exactly - later versions like 22.4R3-S1, 23.2R2, 23.4R2 are not affected
-
Verify DHCPv6 over PPPoE or VLAN configurationRun 'show configuration protocols dhcpv6' and look for PPPoE or VLAN-related interface configurations under the DHCPv6 protocolAffected if DHCPv6 over PPPoE or DHCPv6 over VLAN is configured - this is required for the vulnerability to manifest
-
Confirm Active or Bulk lease query is enabledRun 'show configuration protocols dhcpv6' and search for 'lease-query' or 'bulk-lease-query' statements at the [edit protocols dhcpv6] hierarchyAffected if Active lease-query or bulk-lease-query is enabled - this feature must be present for the memory leak to occur
-
Monitor jdhcpd memory usageRun 'show system processes extensive | match jdhcpd' repeatedly over time and observe if RES memory usage continuously grows without stabilizingAffected if jdhcpd memory usage steadily increases and approaches system limits - indicates active memory leak from this vulnerability
Device is affected only if it is an MX Series running a vulnerable Junos version (22.4, 23.2, or 23.4) with DHCPv6 over PPPoE/VLAN configured AND Active/Bulk lease query enabled, showing growing jdhcpd memory consumption.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.4
Upgrade Junos OS to version 22.4R3-S1, 23.2R2, 23.4R2 or later. As a workaround, monitor jdhcpd memory usage via 'show system processes extensive | match jdhcpd' and plan maintenance windows for upgrades.
22.4R3-S1, 23.2R2, or 23.4R2 (select based on existing release compatibility)
- Verify current Junos OS version with 'show version'
- Confirm the device is an MX Series platform
- Plan upgrade to a fixed release: 22.4R3-S1, 23.2R2, or 23.4R2 (choose based on compatibility requirements)
- Back up current configuration with 'request system snapshot'
- Upgrade Junos OS using standard procedures (e.g., 'request system software add <package>')
- Reboot the device after upgrade completes
- Verify jdhcpd process is running normally with 'show system processes extensive | match jdhcpd'
- Monitor memory usage of jdhcpd periodically to confirm the leak is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33782 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data