CVE-2026-33787
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200 and SRX4600 allows a local attacker with low privileges to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS). When a specific 'show chassis' CLI command is executed, chassisd crashes and restarts which causes a momentary impact to all traffic until all modules are online again. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200 and SRX4600: * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S6, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S7 * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R1-S1, 25.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, and SRX4600. A local attacker with low privileges can trigger daemon crash and restart by executing a specific 'show chassis' CLI command, causing momentary traffic disruption until modules reinitialize.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is affected hardwareExecute 'show chassis hardware' or check the physical device labeling to verify the model is SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, or SRX4600Affected if Device model is NOT one of these four SRX models
-
Identify installed Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' and note the Junos OS version number (for example, 23.2R1-S2, 24.4R1, etc.)Affected if Version matches or falls within the affected branches: 23.2.x, 23.4.x, 24.2.x, 24.4.x, or 25.2.x
-
Verify chassis control daemon is runningExecute 'show system processes extensive | match chassisd' to confirm the chassisd process is activeAffected if The chassisd process is running (this is the default operational state)
Device is affected if it is an SRX1500/SRX4100/SRX4200/SRX4600 running Junos OS version 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, or 25.2 (or any sub-version within these branches), as the vulnerable chassisd daemon will crash when the 'show chassis' command is executed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied Junos OS updates: upgrade to 23.2R2-S6 or later, 23.4R2-S7 or later, 24.2R2-S2 or later, 24.4R2 or later, or 25.2R1-S1/25.2R2 or later depending on the current branch.
23.2R2-S6, 23.4R2-S7, 24.2R2-S2, 24.4R2, 25.2R1-S1, or 25.2R2 (select based on your release train)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected SRX devices (SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600) using: show version
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release for your hardware platform: 23.2R2-S6 or later, 23.4R2-S7 or later, 24.2R2-S2 or later, 24.4R2 or later, or 25.2R1-S1/25.2R2 or later
- 3. Upload the new Junos OS image to the device using: file copy /path/to/junos-image.tgz /var/tmp/
- 4. Install the new image using: request system software add /var/tmp/junos-image.tgz reboot
- 5. After reboot, verify the new version is installed: show version and confirm chassisd is running: show chassis routing-engine
- 6. Test that the 'show chassis' command executes without crashing chassisd
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33787 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data