JunosOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2026-33802

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Missing Authorization vulnerability in the CLI of Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX Series allows a local, authenticated attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). On EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP (Multigigabit) and EX4400 switches, an authenticated, local attacker with no specific permissions or class can execute a specific, privileged CLI 'request' command which will cause complete traffic impact until the system automatically recovers. This issue affects Junos OS on EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP (Multigigabit) and EX4400: * 23.2R2 versions before 23.2R2-S6, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S4, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S3, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R2, * 25.4 versions before 25.4R1-S1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A missing authorization vulnerability in the Junos OS CLI on EX Series switches (EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP, EX4400) allows any authenticated local user with no special permissions to execute a specific privileged CLI 'request' command, causing complete traffic loss until the system auto-recovers.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS to the patched versions specified in the advisory (23.2R2-S6+, 23.4R2-S8+, 24.2R2-S4+, 24.4R2-S3+, 25.2R2+, 25.4R1-S1+) to remediate the missing authorization check.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JunosOperating system
Affected:= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2= 25.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify EX Series switch model
    Run 'show version' or check the physical device label to confirm the model is one of: EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP, or EX4400
    Affected if The device model matches one of the listed EX Series models
  2. Check Junos OS version
    Run 'show version' and locate the Junos version string in the output
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4
  3. Verify local user access exists
    Run 'show system login' to list configured local user accounts
    Affected if One or more local user accounts are configured on the device

You are affected if you have an EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP, or EX4400 switch running Junos OS version 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4 with at least one local user account configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS to the patched versions specified in the advisory (23.2R2-S6+, 23.4R2-S8+, 24.2R2-S4+, 24.4R2-S3+, 25.2R2+, 25.4R1-S1+) to remediate the missing authorization check.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to 23.2R2-S6 / 23.4R2-S8 / 24.2R2-S4 / 24.4R2-S3 / 25.2R2 / 25.4R1-S1 or later (choose based on your current branch)

  1. 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the affected EX Series switch (EX2300, EX4000, EX4100, EX4300-MP, or EX4400) using the command: show version
  2. 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current version branch (23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4)
  3. 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from the Juniper support portal: 23.2R2-S6 or later, 23.4R2-S8 or later, 24.2R2-S4 or later, 24.4R2-S3 or later, 25.2R2 or later, or 25.4R1-S1 or later
  4. 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the switch using: file copy or USB storage
  5. 5. Install the upgrade using: request system software add <package-name> reboot
  6. 6. After the switch reboots, verify the new version is running and confirm the fix is applied: show version
Caveat Standard Junos upgrade precautions apply - test in lab first, ensure configuration backup, plan for brief downtime during reboot

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Junos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,850
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33802 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33802 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data