Junos Os EvolvedOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2026-33803

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 23.2 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a limited information disclosure and availability impact to the device. Due to a wrong initialization, a process which should only be able to communicate internally within the device can be reached over the network via an open port. This leads to a device being inadvertently exposed and increased CPU cycles spent processing ingress packets. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 23.2R2-S7-EVO, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8-EVO, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S5-EVO, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S4-EVO, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R2-S1-EVO, * 25.4 versions before 25.4R1-S2-EVO.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Juniper Junos OS Evolved internal process that should only communicate via internal device mechanisms is incorrectly initialized with network accessibility, exposing an open port to the network. This allows unauthenticated attackers to send packets to this internal process, causing limited information disclosure and increased CPU usage from processing unexpected ingress traffic.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS Evolved to the patched versions specified in the advisory. If immediate patching is not possible, network filtering controls should be implemented to restrict unauthorized access to the exposed port.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Junos Os EvolvedOperating system
Affected:< 23.2= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2= 25.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Junos OS Evolved version
    Run 'show version' or 'request system version' to obtain the exact Junos OS Evolved version running on the device
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: < 23.2, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4
  2. Identify all listening network ports
    Use 'show system connections' or 'netstat -an' to list all TCP and UDP ports in LISTEN state on the device
    Affected if An unexpected or undocumented port is found listening, particularly on external or non-loopback interfaces, which could indicate the misconfigured internal process
  3. Verify which processes are bound to listening ports
    Run 'show system processes' or use 'lsof -i' (if available) to identify which process owns each listening port
    Affected if An internal or management-only process is found bound to a network-accessible interface (0.0.0.0 or external IP) rather than localhost or internal mechanisms
  4. Check for unexplained CPU utilization spikes
    Use 'show system processes summary' or 'show chassis firmware' to monitor CPU usage, looking for processes consuming unexpectedly high resources
    Affected if A process that should only run internally is consuming elevated CPU due to processing unexpected ingress network traffic
  5. Review network interface bindings for internal services
    Check the configuration or running state of internal services to confirm whether they are bound to internal-only interfaces (127.0.0.1 or internal VLANs)
    Affected if An internal service is bound to a globally reachable address when it should only be accessible via internal device mechanisms

If the device runs an affected Junos OS Evolved version and has an internal process unexpectedly listening on a network-accessible port, the device is affected by this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 23.2 or later
Fixed in 23.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to the patched versions specified in the advisory. If immediate patching is not possible, network filtering controls should be implemented to restrict unauthorized access to the exposed port.

Recommended fix High confidence

23.2R2-S7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8-EVO, 24.2R2-S5-EVO, 24.4R2-S4-EVO, 25.2R2-S1-EVO, or 25.4R1-S2-EVO (depending on release train)

  1. 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version' command
  2. 2. Determine which release train your current version belongs to (23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4)
  3. 3. Plan the upgrade based on your current version and select the appropriate fixed release: for 23.2 train upgrade to 23.2R2-S7-EVO or later, for 23.4 train upgrade to 23.4R2-S8-EVO or later, for 24.2 train upgrade to 24.2R2-S5-EVO or later, for 24.4 train upgrade to 24.4R2-S4-EVO or later, for 25.2 train upgrade to 25.2R2-S1-EVO or later, for 25.4 train upgrade to 25.4R1-S2-EVO or later
  4. 4. Download the recommended fixed Junos OS Evolved image from the Juniper support portal
  5. 5. Back up the current device configuration
  6. 6. Upload the new Junos OS Evolved image to the device
  7. 7. Perform a software installation using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
  8. 8. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command
Caveat Standard Junos OS upgrade considerations apply - ensure compatibility with existing configurations and review Juniper upgrade documentation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Junos Os Evolved Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33803 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33803 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data