CVE-2026-33838
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDouble free in Windows Message Queuing allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA double-free memory corruption vulnerability in Windows Message Queuing (MSMQ) can be exploited by an authorized local attacker to escalate privileges to higher integrity levels. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management when handling MSMQ message objects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.19044.7291< 10.0.19045.7291< 10.0.22631.7079< 10.0.26100.8390< 10.0.26200.8390< 10.0.28000.2113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if MSMQ service is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Message Queuing' service, or run: Get-Service -Name MSMQ in PowerShellAffected if The Message Queuing service is listed or returns a valid service object
-
Confirm MSMQ service is runningRun: Get-Service -Name MSMQ | Select-Object Status, StartType, or check via services.mscAffected if The service status shows as Running (this is required for exploitation)
-
Check Windows version numberRun: winver.exe or in PowerShell: [System.Environment]::OSVersion.Version.ToString() or Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsVersionAffected if The installed version falls below the patched thresholds for your Windows release (1607<14393.9140, 1809<17763.8755, 21h2<19044.7291, 22h2<19045.7291, 23h2<22631.7079, 24h2<26100.8390, 25h2<26200.8390, 26h1<28000.2113)
-
Check MSMQ components presentRun: Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online | Where-Object {$_.FeatureName -like '*MSMQ*'} or check registry: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSMQAffected if MSMQ features are enabled (particularly MSMQ Server)
If MSMQ service is installed and running on a Windows version below the patched build number for your release, the environment is likely affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.19044.7291
Apply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability when released. If MSMQ is not required, consider disabling the service. Prioritize patching endpoint systems that handle sensitive data or have high exposure.
Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9140 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8755 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7291 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7291 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.7079 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8390 | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8390 | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2113
- Check the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in command prompt
- Identify which Windows 10 or 11 version and build is currently installed
- Apply Windows Updates by opening Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update and clicking 'Check for updates'
- Alternatively, manually install the appropriate cumulative update for your Windows version from Microsoft Update Catalog
- After installation, restart the computer to complete the patch process
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your Windows version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33838 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33838 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data