CVE-2026-33862
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0014), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0012), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0009), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0005), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions). The affected application does not properly encode or filter user-supplied data. This could allow an attacker to inject malicious code that can be executed by other users when they visit the affected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Siemens Teamcenter. The application fails to properly encode or filter user-supplied input before rendering it in web pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the browsers of other users who view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2312.0, < 2312.0014>= 2406.0, < 2406.0012>= 2412.0, < 2412.0009>= 2506.0, < 2506.0005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Teamcenter installationLocate the Teamcenter installation directory or check the TC_ROOT environment variable to find where Teamcenter is installedAffected if Teamcenter software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed Teamcenter versionCheck the version of the installed Teamcenter instance by examining version files, installation logs, or using Teamcenter version commandsAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 2312.0 to 2312.0013, 2406.0 to 2406.0011, 2412.0 to 2412.0008, or 2506.0 to 2506.0004
-
Verify web interface is accessibleConfirm that the Teamcenter web client or rich client web renderer is accessible and in useAffected if The web interface is exposed and users can access pages where user-supplied content is displayed
-
Identify user input points in the applicationMap areas where users can submit or upload content that gets stored and rendered to other users, such as documents, metadata fields, comments, or custom attributesAffected if The application allows users to create or modify content that is stored and subsequently rendered in web pages without sanitization
You are affected if your installed Teamcenter version is within any of the vulnerable version ranges AND the application renders user-supplied input in web pages without proper encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2312.00142406.00122412.0009
Apply the vendor patches: V2312.0014 or later, V2406.0012 or later, V2412.0009 or later, V2506.0005 or later, V2512.0001 or later. Until patched, implement input validation and output encoding as compensating controls.
2312.0014, 2406.0012, 2412.0009, 2506.0005 (depending on your current major version)
- Contact Siemens Support or access the Siemens Industry Online Support (SIOS) portal to obtain the appropriate patch/upgrade package for your Teamcenter version
- For Teamcenter V2312 users: Upgrade to V2312.0014 or later
- For Teamcenter V2406 users: Upgrade to V2406.0012 or later
- For Teamcenter V2412 users: Upgrade to V2412.0009 or later
- For Teamcenter V2506 users: Upgrade to V2506.0005 or later
- After upgrading, verify that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by testing with the Siemens-provided validation procedures
- Review Siemens patch notes for any additional prerequisites or post-upgrade configuration requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33862 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data