CVE-2026-33951
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSignal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Prior to version 2.24.0-beta.1, the SignalK Server exposes an unauthenticated HTTP endpoint that allows remote attackers to modify navigation data source priorities. This endpoint, accessible via PUT /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities, does not enforce authentication or authorization checks and directly assigns user-controlled input to the server configuration. As a result, attackers can influence which GPS, AIS, or other sensor data sources are trusted by the system. The changes are immediately applied and persisted to disk, allowing the manipulation to survive server restarts. This issue has been patched in version 2.24.0-beta.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSignal K Server prior to version 2.24.0-beta.1 exposes an unauthenticated HTTP PUT endpoint at /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities that allows remote attackers to modify navigation data source priorities (GPS, AIS, sensors) without any authentication or authorization. The endpoint directly assigns user-controlled input to server configuration and persists changes to disk, allowing manipulation to survive server restarts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.24.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Signal K Server installationLocate Signal K Server installation and determine its version. Common methods: check package.json version if self-hosted, check Docker image tag, or query the server API at /signalk/ for the 'version' field in the responseAffected if Server version is < 2.24.0 (or version is unknown/unretrievable)
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsSend an unauthenticated HTTP PUT request to http://<server>:8080/signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities with a test payload such as {"test":1} and observe the response codeAffected if The request returns HTTP 200 OK or any success response without requiring authentication credentials
-
Inspect current sourcePriorities configurationCheck the Signal K Server configuration file (typically at ~/.signalk/config.json or in the server's data directory) for the 'sourcePriorities' key. Also, retrieve it via GET /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities without authenticationAffected if The endpoint returns configuration data without auth, or the config file contains sourcePriorities with unexpected/modified values you did not set
-
Review access logs for unauthorized PUT requestsExamine Signal K Server access logs (check logs/ directory or Docker logs) for entries matching PUT requests to /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities from unexpected IP addresses or at unexpected times
You are affected if Signal K Server version is below 2.24.0 AND the /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities endpoint responds to unauthenticated PUT requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.24.0
Upgrade to Signal K Server version 2.24.0-beta.1 or later to apply the patch; if immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the vulnerable endpoint via firewall or network segmentation.
2.24.0-beta.1
- Upgrade Signal K Server to version 2.24.0-beta.1 or later by stopping the server, updating the installation, and restarting the service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33951 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33951 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data