CVE-2026-34020
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of GET Request Method With Sensitive Query Strings vulnerability in Apache OpenMeetings. The REST login endpoint uses HTTP GET method with username and password passed as query parameters. Please check references regarding possible impact This issue affects Apache OpenMeetings: from 3.1.3 before 9.0.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.0.0, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe REST login endpoint in Apache OpenMeetings uses HTTP GET method with username and password transmitted as URL query parameters. This exposes credentials in server logs, browser history, proxies, and network monitoring, as GET requests are inherently less secure for sensitive data transmission.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.1.3, < 9.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache OpenMeetings installation and versionLocate the OpenMeetings installation directory and check the version file or war file name. Common locations include /opt/openmeetings, /usr/share/openmeetings, or the application server webapps directory. Look for a version manifest, pom.xml, or the war file name containing the version number.Affected if The installed version is >= 3.1.3 and < 9.0.0
-
Locate the REST login endpoint configurationSearch the OpenMeetings configuration files for REST API endpoint definitions. Look in conf/ or config directories for files like rest-config.xml, web.xml, or annotations defining the /login or /user/login endpoint.Affected if The REST login endpoint is enabled and accessible at the default path /openmeetings/services/user/login or similar REST paths
-
Test the REST login endpoint for GET method acceptanceSend a GET request to the login endpoint with username and password as query parameters, for example: curl -k 'https://<server>/openmeetings/services/user/login?username=user&password=pass'. Observe if the server responds with success or processes the request.Affected if The endpoint accepts GET requests and processes credentials from query parameters (returns 200 OK or authentication success)
-
Examine server access logs for credential exposureReview HTTP access logs from the web server (Apache HTTP, Nginx) or application server (Tomcat, Jetty) that fronts OpenMeetings. Search for GET requests to the login endpoint containing 'username=' and 'password=' in the URL.Affected if Plaintext credentials appear in access logs as part of the request URL query string
You are affected if Apache OpenMeetings version 3.1.3 through 8.x is installed and the REST login endpoint is accessible, as it will accept credentials via GET request parameters that get logged in plain text.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.0
Upgrade to Apache OpenMeetings version 9.0.0 which implements proper POST-based authentication for the login endpoint.
9.0.0
- 1. Backup all OpenMeetings data, configuration files, and database
- 2. Review the release notes for version 9.0.0 to understand any configuration or migration requirements
- 3. Download Apache OpenMeetings version 9.0.0 from the official Apache distribution (https://openmeetings.apache.org)
- 4. Stop the current OpenMeetings service
- 5. Install version 9.0.0 following the official upgrade instructions
- 6. Start the OpenMeetings service
- 7. Verify the login endpoint now uses POST method instead of GET for sensitive credentials
- 8. Test login functionality to ensure the application works correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34020 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34020 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data