CVE-2026-34076
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClerk JavaScript is the official JavaScript repository for Clerk authentication. In @clerk/hono from versions 0.1.0 to before 0.1.5, @clerk/express from versions 2.0.0 to before 2.0.7, @clerk/backend from versions 3.0.0 to before 3.2.3, and @clerk/fastify from versions 3.1.0 to before 3.1.5, the clerkFrontendApiProxy function in @clerk/backend is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a request path that causes the proxy to send the application's Clerk-Secret-Key to an attacker-controlled server. This issue has been patched in @clerk/hono version 0.1.5, @clerk/express version 2.0.7, @clerk/backend version 3.2.3, and @clerk/fastify version 3.1.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe clerkFrontendApiProxy function in @clerk/backend is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a malicious request path that causes the proxy to forward the application's Clerk-Secret-Key to an attacker-controlled server, resulting in complete credential theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed @clerk/backend versionRun 'npm list @clerk/backend' or check your package.json for the @clerk/backend dependency versionAffected if Version is lower than 3.2.3 (vulnerable range: all versions before patch)
-
Identify installed @clerk/hono versionRun 'npm list @clerk/hono' or check package.json if this package is usedAffected if Version is lower than 0.1.5 and the package is installed
-
Identify installed @clerk/express versionRun 'npm list @clerk/express' or check package.json if this package is usedAffected if Version is lower than 2.0.7 and the package is installed
-
Identify installed @clerk/fastify versionRun 'npm list @clerk/fastify' or check package.json if this package is usedAffected if Version is lower than 3.1.5 and the package is installed
-
Audit network logs for suspicious outbound requestsReview application logs and network traffic for requests from your server to unknown external IPs, especially containing paths like '/api/v1/backend_api' forwarding the Clerk-Secret-Key headerAffected if Any outbound requests to attacker-controlled servers containing your Clerk-Secret-Key are observed
Your environment is affected if any of the @clerk packages (@clerk/backend <3.2.3, @clerk/hono <0.1.5, @clerk/express <2.0.7, @clerk/fastify <3.1.5) are installed and the clerkFrontendApiProxy endpoint is exposed, or if your Clerk-Secret-Key has been leaked to an external server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected Clerk packages (@clerk/hono to 0.1.5+, @clerk/express to 2.0.7+, @clerk/backend to 3.2.3+, @clerk/fastify to 3.1.5+) to the patched versions. Rotate any Clerk-Secret-Key that may have been exposed prior to patching.
Upgrade to @clerk/[email protected], @clerk/[email protected], @clerk/[email protected], and @clerk/[email protected] or later
- Identify which Clerk packages (@clerk/hono, @clerk/express, @clerk/backend, or @clerk/fastify) are used in the application
- Run npm list to see current installed versions of affected Clerk packages
- Update @clerk/hono to version 0.1.5 or higher using: npm install @clerk/hono@^0.1.5
- Update @clerk/express to version 2.0.7 or higher using: npm install @clerk/express@^2.0.7
- Update @clerk/backend to version 3.2.3 or higher using: npm install @clerk/backend@^3.2.3
- Update @clerk/fastify to version 3.1.5 or higher using: npm install @clerk/fastify@^3.1.5
- Run npm install to install the updated packages
- Verify the installation was successful by checking the installed versions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34076 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34076 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data