Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2026-34259

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to an OS Command Execution vulnerability in SAP Forecasting & Replenishment, an authenticated attacker with administrative authorizations could abuse a non-remote-enabled function to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read or modify any system data or shut down the system, resulting in a complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OS Command Execution vulnerability in SAP Forecasting & Replenishment allows an authenticated attacker with administrative authorizations to execute arbitrary operating system commands through a non-remote-enabled function, enabling complete system compromise including data exfiltration, modification, or shutdown.

MitigationApply SAP security patches for this vulnerability immediately; restrict administrative authorizations to minimum required personnel and review user access controls until patch can be deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SAP Forecasting & Replenishment is installed
    Access SAP transaction SE11 or SM37 and search for packages or programs related to Forecasting & Replenishment (typically under SAP APO or SCM modules). Use transaction SPAM to view installed software components.
    Affected if The product SAP Forecasting & Replenishment is present in the SAP system
  2. Determine the installed version of SAP Forecasting & Replenishment
    Use transaction SAINT (SAP Add-On Installation Tool) or execute report RS Component Version in SE38 to list installed SAP components and their versions. Compare against any available SAP security notes or version information for this CVE.
    Affected if The installed version falls within the range affected by CVE-2026-34259 (version comparison required)
  3. Review administrative authorizations in the system
    Use transaction SUIM (User Information System) and run the report for roles with SAP_ALL or administrative profiles. Check transaction PFCG for roles assigned to users that include authorization objects S_RFC, S_ADM_SERV, or similar administrative authorizations.
    Affected if Users possess administrative authorizations that can invoke the vulnerable non-remote-enabled function
  4. Identify access to the vulnerable function module
    Use transaction SE37 (Function Builder) to locate function modules within the Forecasting & Replenishment component. Check authorization object S_RFC for access to function groups. Review transaction SU53 after user attempts to identify which functions are being called.
    Affected if The vulnerable function module is accessible to authenticated users with administrative rights
  5. Check for RFC and function module exposure
    Use transaction SM59 (RFC Destinations) to verify if the affected function module has RFC enabled. Use transaction SE37 and check the 'Remote-enabled module' flag. Review transaction SIFP (SAP Interface Directory) if available.
    Affected if The function module is exposed via RFC despite being classified as non-remote-enabled, or is callable by authenticated administrative users

A user is affected if SAP Forecasting & Replenishment is installed with a vulnerable version and an authenticated user with administrative authorizations can access the vulnerable function module.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply SAP security patches for this vulnerability immediately; restrict administrative authorizations to minimum required personnel and review user access controls until patch can be deployed.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,360
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34259 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34259 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data