CVE-2026-34345
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAccess of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA type confusion vulnerability exists in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (AFD.sys), a kernel-mode driver that handles Winsock operations. The flaw allows an authorized local attacker to exploit improper type handling to elevate privileges from a standard user to SYSTEM level. This is a kernel-level privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Windows systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.19044.7291< 10.0.19045.7291< 10.0.22631.7079< 10.0.26100.8390< 10.0.26200.8390< 10.0.28000.2113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' in Command Prompt to get the exact build numberAffected if The build number falls below the fixed version for your Windows release (e.g., 10.0.14393.9140 for Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.8755 for Windows 10 1809, etc.)
-
Verify Windows editionRun 'winver' to confirm whether you are on Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or Windows 11 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, or 26h1Affected if The system runs any of the affected editions listed in the version ranges and the build is below the corresponding threshold
-
Check AFD.sys file versionLocate AFD.sys in C:\Windows\System32\drivers\, right-click and select Properties, then view the File Version details, or run 'powershell (Get-Item C:\Windows\System32\drivers\AFD.sys).VersionInfo'Affected if The file version is lower than the build number threshold for your Windows version (the driver version typically matches the OS build)
-
Confirm standard user access existsThis vulnerability requires a local authenticated user account. Verify the accounts on the system by running 'net user' in Command PromptAffected if Standard non-privileged local or domain users exist on the system, making them potential attackers if the patch is not applied
The system is affected if it runs any of the listed Windows 10 or 11 versions with a build number lower than the specified threshold, and the AFD.sys driver matches that vulnerable build range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.19044.7291
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for this vulnerability through Windows Update or manual patch deployment. Verify that endpoint protection and least-privilege principles are enforced to limit local attack surface.
Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9140 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8755 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7291 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7291 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.7079 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8390 | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8390 | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2113
- 1. Identify the current Windows version by opening Settings > System > About or running 'winver' in the command prompt
- 2. Determine which build version is currently installed (e.g., for Windows 10 22h2, check if below 10.0.19045.7291)
- 3. Open Windows Update by going to Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- 4. Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- 5. After installation, restart the system when prompted
- 6. Verify the update was successful by checking the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
- 7. Alternatively, download the specific security update from the Microsoft Update Catalog matching your Windows version (search for the CVE patch date)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34345 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data