Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-34474

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Sensitive data exposure leading to admin/WLAN credential leak in ZTE ZXHN H298A 1.1 and H108N 2.6. A crafted request to the router web interface can expose sensitive device and account information. In affected builds, the response may include the administrator password and WLAN PSK, enabling authentication bypass and network compromise. Some firmware versions may expose only partial identifiers (e.g., serial number, ESSID, MAC addresses).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an information disclosure vulnerability in ZTE ZXHN H298A (1.1) and H108N (2.6) routers where a specially crafted HTTP request to the web management interface returns sensitive credentials in the response, including the administrator password and WLAN Pre-Shared Key (PSK). The attack requires network access to the router's web interface but does not require prior authentication, making it highly exploitable.

MitigationImmediately restrict access to the router's web management interface from untrusted networks, disable remote WAN management if enabled, and contact ZTE for available firmware updates that address this credential exposure. Consider changing exposed credentials immediately if exploitation is suspected.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the router model
    Check the device label on the router or log into the admin interface and look for the model number (typically displayed on the status or system info page)
    Affected if The device is a ZTE ZXHN H298A or H108N model
  2. Check the firmware version
    In the router's web admin interface, navigate to Status or System Information page to find the firmware version. For H298A, look for version 1.1. For H108N, look for version 2.6
    Affected if The firmware version matches exactly H298A (1.1) or H108N (2.6)
  3. Determine if the web management interface is network-accessible
    From a remote system, attempt to access the router's HTTP interface (typically on port 80 or 8080) by entering the router's IP address in a web browser
    Affected if The web interface responds and is accessible from an untrusted network (not just from LAN)
  4. Verify if the vulnerability is present
    Send a crafted HTTP GET request to the router's web interface (e.g., to common endpoints like / Luci/ , /admin/ , or the login page) and observe if the response contains plaintext credentials such as admin password or WLAN PSK in the HTML or JSON response
    Affected if The HTTP response contains sensitive credentials (administrator password or WLAN Pre-Shared Key) without having authenticated first

You are affected if you own a ZTE ZXHN H298A (firmware 1.1) or H108N (firmware 2.6) router and its web management interface is accessible from a network where untrusted users can send HTTP requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately restrict access to the router's web management interface from untrusted networks, disable remote WAN management if enabled, and contact ZTE for available firmware updates that address this credential exposure. Consider changing exposed credentials immediately if exploitation is suspected.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34474 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data