CVE-2026-34582
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBotan is a C++ cryptography library. Prior to version 3.11.1, the TLS 1.3 implementation allowed ApplicationData records to be processed prior to the Finished message being received. A server which is attempting to enforce client authentication via certificates can by bypassed by a client which entirely omits Certificate, CertificateVerify, and the Finished message and instead sends application data records. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Botan versions prior to 3.11.1, the TLS 1.3 implementation incorrectly allowed ApplicationData records to be processed before the Finished message was received. This violates TLS 1.3 protocol ordering and allows a client to bypass client certificate authentication by omitting the Certificate, CertificateVerify, and Finished messages entirely while sending application data directly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, <= 3.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Botan TLS library is in useSearch for files named 'botan' or 'libbotan' in your system, or check package manager for installed botan packages. Also check application dependencies for botan references.Affected if Botan library is present in the environment
-
Determine installed Botan versionRun 'botan --version' or check the library file version (e.g., libbotan-3.so.3.11.0). For npm packages, run 'npm list botan'. For other language bindings, consult the appropriate package query command.Affected if Version is >= 3.0.0 and <= 3.11.0
-
Verify TLS 1.3 is enabledCheck application configuration files or code for TLS 1.3 protocol configuration. Look for settings like 'tls_version' or 'max_tls_version' set to 1.3, or examine TLS handshake logs for 'TLSv1.3' in cipher negotiation.Affected if TLS 1.3 is enabled and in use
-
Confirm client certificate authentication is requiredCheck TLS server configuration for 'verify_client' or 'request_client_cert' set to 'required' or 'mandatory'. Examine application code for TLS_CERT_REQUIRED or similar settings.Affected if Server requires or requests client certificate authentication
Environment is affected if Botan TLS library versions 3.0.0 through 3.11.0 are in use with TLS 1.3 and client certificate authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Botan to version 3.11.1 or later to ensure proper TLS 1.3 handshake sequencing and client certificate authentication enforcement.
Botan 3.11.1
- 1. Identify the current version of Botan library in use by checking project dependencies or build configuration
- 2. Update the Botan library to version 3.11.1 or later using the appropriate package manager or build system (e.g., package manager like apt/yum, or rebuild from source)
- 3. Rebuild and redeploy any applications that link against the Botan library
- 4. Verify the TLS 1.3 implementation correctly enforces the proper handshake order, ensuring ApplicationData cannot be processed before the Finished message is received
- 5. If using client certificate authentication in TLS 1.3, test that the authentication is properly enforced and cannot be bypassed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34582 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34582 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data