CVE-2026-34623
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, FP11.7 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a specially crafted web page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where attackers can manipulate the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of a victim's browser. Exploitation requires user interaction, specifically that the victim must visit a specially crafted web page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.5.24.0< 6.5.11.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Web Console at /system/console/configMgr or check the quickstart JAR file name for the version number (e.g., aem-quickstart-6.5.24.0.jar). Alternatively, check the version manifest in the crx-quickstart folder.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.24.0 or earlier, or the Feature Pack (FP) version is 11.7 or earlier.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager Screens versionIn AEM, navigate to the Screens player or check the version through the AEM package manager. The Screens package is typically installed as com.adobe.aem.screens:screens-core.Affected if The installed AEM Screens version is lower than 6.5.11.8.
-
Confirm the instance is exposed to untrusted web contentIdentify whether the AEM instance renders or displays user-supplied content in web pages without sanitization. Check if external or untrusted content is displayed in any published pages or components.Affected if The AEM instance allows rendering of untrusted or unsanitized content in web pages accessible to users.
-
Verify if Content Security Policy headers are enforcedInspect HTTP response headers on published AEM pages using browser developer tools or a web proxy. Look for CSP headers in the response.Affected if No strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers are set, allowing inline scripts or untrusted script sources to execute.
You are affected if your AEM version is 6.5.24.0 or earlier (or FP11.7 or earlier) AND your instance renders untrusted content in web pages without proper sanitization or CSP protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.11.8
Implement output encoding and input validation for all user-controlled DOM elements, deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict script execution, and upgrade to the patched AEM version (6.5.25 or later, FP11.8 or later).
AEM 6.5.24.1+ (for AEM); AEM Screens 6.5.11.8+ (for Screens)
- 1. Identify the exact Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) product and version currently deployed (AEM Assets, AEM Sites, or AEM Screens).
- 2. For AEM (non-Screens): Upgrade to version 6.5.24.1 or later, as version 6.5.24.0 and earlier are affected by this DOM-based XSS vulnerability.
- 3. For AEM Screens: Upgrade to version 6.5.11.8 or later, as versions prior to 6.5.11.8 are affected.
- 4. After upgrading, verify the AEM instance starts successfully and all critical workflows function normally.
- 5. Test the fix by confirming that user-supplied content in the DOM is properly sanitized and no unsanitized JavaScript execution occurs.
- 6. Review Adobe's official security bulletin for any additional required hotfixes or configuration changes.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34623 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data