CVE-2026-34750
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPayload is a free and open source headless content management system. Prior to version 3.78.0 in @payloadcms/storage-azure, @payloadcms/storage-gcs, @payloadcms/storage-r2, and @payloadcms/storage-s3, the client-upload signed-URL endpoints for S3, GCS, Azure, and R2 did not properly sanitize filenames. An attacker could craft filenames to escape the intended storage location. This issue has been patched in version 3.78.0 for @payloadcms/storage-azure, @payloadcms/storage-gcs, @payloadcms/storage-r2, and @payloadcms/storage-s3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Payload CMS storage plugins (@payloadcms/storage-azure, @payloadcms/storage-gcs, @payloadcms/storage-r2, @payloadcms/storage-s3) where signed-URL endpoints for client-upload did not sanitize filenames, allowing attackers to craft filenames that escape the intended storage location and write files to arbitrary paths in cloud storage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.78.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Payload CMS storage packagesRun 'npm list @payloadcms/storage-azure @payloadcms/storage-gcs @payloadcms/storage-r2 @payloadcms/storage-s3' or check package.json dependencies for any @payloadcms/storage-* packagesAffected if Any of these four storage packages are installed in the project
-
Check version of storage packagesRun 'npm list @payloadcms/storage-azure' (and other storage packages) to see installed version numbersAffected if Any installed storage package version is below 3.78.0
-
Verify client-upload endpoint is enabledCheck payload.config.ts for storage configuration - look for 'clientUpload' property set to true in the storage plugin optionsAffected if The storage plugin has clientUpload enabled, making the signed-URL upload endpoint active
-
Confirm storage adapter is in useReview payload.config.ts to ensure the affected storage plugins are actually assigned to a collection's 'upload' or 'files' configurationAffected if Collections are configured to use one of the vulnerable storage adapters for file uploads
You are affected if you have any @payloadcms/storage-azure, @payloadcms/storage-gcs, @payloadcms/storage-r2, or @payloadcms/storage-s3 package installed with version below 3.78.0 and have client-upload enabled for that storage configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.78.0
Upgrade to version 3.78.0 or later of the affected @payloadcms/storage-* packages and verify file upload functionality continues to work correctly with various filename patterns.
@payloadcms/[email protected], @payloadcms/[email protected], @payloadcms/[email protected], @payloadcms/[email protected]
- Identify which Payload storage plugin(s) are in use: @payloadcms/storage-azure, @payloadcms/storage-gcs, @payloadcms/storage-r2, or @payloadcms/storage-s3
- Run npm update for the specific storage package(s) to version 3.78.0 (e.g., npm install @payloadcms/[email protected])
- Alternatively, run npm update @payloadcms/storage-s3 @payloadcms/storage-gcs @payloadcms/storage-azure @payloadcms/storage-r2 to update all at once
- Verify the installed version matches 3.78.0 using npm list <package-name>
- Test that file uploads via the client-upload signed-URL endpoints work correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34750 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34750 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data