CVE-2026-34804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEndian Firewall version 3.3.25 and prior allow stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the dscp parameter to /manage/qos/rules/. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript that is stored and executed when other users view the affected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Endian Firewall's QoS rules management interface (version 3.3.25 and prior). An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript through the dscp parameter at /manage/qos/rules/, which persists and executes when other users view the affected page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.3.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Endian Firewall installation and versionLocate the Endian Firewall installation and determine its exact version number (typically visible in the system dashboard, about page, or via the command line interface if accessible).Affected if The installed version is Endian Firewall Community 3.3.25 or any prior version.
-
Confirm QoS module is enabledAccess the Endian Firewall admin interface and verify whether the QoS (Quality of Service) module or feature is currently enabled in the system configuration.Affected if The QoS module is enabled and functional in the firewall.
-
Access QoS rules management interfaceNavigate to the QoS rules management page at /manage/qos/rules/ using the web admin interface and log in with valid credentials.Affected if You can successfully access the QoS rules management interface with an authenticated session.
-
Inspect existing QoS rules for suspicious contentReview all QoS rules listed in the management interface and examine the dscp parameter values for any unexpected, encoded, or suspicious-looking strings that may indicate injected JavaScript code.Affected if Any QoS rule contains unsanitized or malformed dscp values that could contain XSS payloads.
A user is affected if they are running Endian Firewall Community version 3.3.25 or earlier, have the QoS module enabled, and have QoS rules with potentially malicious dscp parameter values present in the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Endian Firewall to a version newer than 3.3.25, or implement strict input validation and output encoding on the dscp parameter to prevent XSS injection.
Endian Firewall Community 3.3.26 or later
- 1. Check current Endian Firewall Community version via the web interface (System > Status) or command line (grep version /etc/*release* or similar)
- 2. Navigate to the QoS rules section at /manage/qos/rules/ to confirm the vulnerable endpoint exists in your installation
- 3. If version is 3.3.25 or lower, plan for upgrade to version 3.3.26 or later which contains the fix for CVE-2026-34804
- 4. Before upgrading, backup current configuration via the web interface (Maintenance > Backup) or /var/tmp/backup directory
- 5. Perform the upgrade following Endian's standard upgrade procedure for Community edition
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and navigate to /manage/qos/rules/ to confirm the page loads correctly
- 7. Validate the fix by attempting to inject benign test payload in the dscp parameter (e.g., <script>alert('test')</script>) and confirming it is properly sanitized/escaped
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data