CVE-2026-34963
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedbarebox version prior to 2026.04.0 contains multiple memory-safety vulnerabilities in the EFI PE loader in efi/loader/pe.c where integer overflow in virtual image size computation using 32-bit arithmetic on section VirtualAddress and size values allows undersized heap allocation, and PE section loading logic fails to validate that PointerToRawData plus copied size remains within the PE file buffer. An attacker can supply a malicious EFI PE binary via TFTP, USB, SD card, or network boot to trigger heap buffer overflow or out-of-bounds read from heap memory, potentially achieving code execution in bootloader context.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencebarebox bootloader versions prior to 2026.04.0 contain two memory-safety flaws in the EFI PE loader (efi/loader/pe.c). First, 32-bit integer overflow in virtual image size calculation using VirtualAddress and size fields results in undersized heap allocations. Second, the PE section loading logic lacks validation that PointerToRawData plus the size to copy stays within the PE file buffer bounds. An attacker can supply a specially crafted EFI PE binary via TFTP, USB, SD card, or network boot to trigger heap buffer overflows or out-of-bounds reads, potentially achieving code execution in bootloader context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.04.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed barebox versionRun the 'bareboxversion' command at the bootloader prompt, or inspect boot logs and build artifacts for the barebox version stringAffected if The version is prior to 2026.04.0 (e.g., 2025.x.x or earlier)
-
Check if EFI PE loader is in useInspect boot configuration and environment variables for EFI boot paths or PE binary loading directives (look for .efi file references in boot commands)Affected if EFI PE binaries are being loaded via boot commands such as bootefi, efiboot, or similar
-
Identify configured boot sourcesReview boot scripts and environment for enabled boot mechanisms: check for tftp, usb, mmc/sd, or network boot (dhcp, pxelinux) configurationAffected if Any of TFTP, USB, SD card, or network boot interfaces are enabled and point to potentially untrusted sources
-
Verify source authenticationExamine whether boot sources (TFTP server, USB device, SD card, network) are from trusted and controlled sources only, or are publicly accessibleAffected if Boot media or network boot sources allow loading binaries from untrusted or unauthenticated origins
You are affected if your barebox version is earlier than 2026.04.0 AND the EFI PE loader is actively used to boot from TFTP, USB, SD card, or network sources that are not exclusively trusted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.04.0
Update barebox to version 2026.04.0 or later which includes proper 64-bit arithmetic for size calculations and bounds validation in the PE loader. If updating is not immediately feasible, restrict boot sources (TFTP, USB, SD, network) to trusted binaries only.
Barebox 2026.04.0 or later
- 1. Identify all deployed Barebox instances that may load EFI PE binaries from untrusted sources (TFTP, USB, SD cards, network boot)
- 2. Obtain Barebox version 2026.04.0 or later from the official barebox repository at https://www.barebox.org/ or https://github.com/barebox/barebox
- 3. Build the updated Barebox for your target platform(s) using the standard build process (typically 'make ARCH=<arch> defconfig' followed by 'make ARCH=<arch>')
- 4. Replace the vulnerable Barebox bootloader image on affected devices with the fixed version
- 5. Verify the upgrade by checking the Barebox version at boot time using the 'version' command
- 6. Ensure that any EFI PE binaries loaded from network or removable media are from trusted sources, as a defense-in-depth measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34963 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34963 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data