JellyfinApplication

CVE-2026-35034

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.11.7 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. Versions prior to 10.11.7 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the SyncPlay group creation endpoint (POST /SyncPlay/New), where an authenticated user can create groups with names of unlimited size due to insufficient input validation. By sending large payloads combined with arbitrary group IDs, an attacker can lock out the endpoint for other clients attempting to join SyncPlay groups and significantly increase the memory usage of the Jellyfin process, potentially leading to an out-of-memory crash. This issue has been fixed in version 10.11.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jellyfin versions prior to 10.11.7 have a denial of service vulnerability in the SyncPlay group creation endpoint (POST /SyncPlay/New). The endpoint lacks input validation on the group name parameter, allowing authenticated users to submit groups with unlimited-length names. Attackers can send large payloads with arbitrary group IDs to exhaust server memory and lock out legitimate users from joining SyncPlay groups, potentially causing an out-of-memory crash.

MitigationUpgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.7 or later. Additionally, implement input validation enforcing reasonable length limits on SyncPlay group names to prevent similar issues.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JellyfinApplication
Affected:< 10.11.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Jellyfin version
    Check your Jellyfin server version through the web UI (Dashboard > General > Version) or by inspecting the jellyfin-web.jar or docker container tag, or running 'jellyfin --version' if using the binary
    Affected if Version is below 10.11.7 (e.g., 10.11.6, 10.10.x, 10.9.x, etc.)
  2. Verify SyncPlay plugin is enabled
    Navigate to Dashboard > Plugins > SyncPlay in the Jellyfin web interface, or inspect the plugins configuration file in the Jellyfin data directory
    Affected if SyncPlay plugin is installed and enabled on the server
  3. Confirm authenticated access to SyncPlay endpoint
    Review user permissions in Dashboard > Users to determine if regular authenticated users can access SyncPlay functionality; check if anonymous access is permitted in SyncPlay settings
    Affected if Authenticated (non-admin) users have access to create SyncPlay groups

Your environment is affected if you are running Jellyfin versions prior to 10.11.7 with the SyncPlay feature enabled and accessible to authenticated users, as this allows the DoS condition on the /SyncPlay/New endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.11.7 or later
Fixed in 10.11.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.7 or later. Additionally, implement input validation enforcing reasonable length limits on SyncPlay group names to prevent similar issues.

Recommended fix High confidence

Jellyfin 10.11.7 or later

  1. Backup your Jellyfin configuration and data directory before proceeding
  2. Stop the Jellyfin service
  3. Upgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.7 or later using your package manager or by downloading the latest release from the official Jellyfin website
  4. Verify the installed version matches the fixed release (10.11.7 or higher)
  5. Restart the Jellyfin service
  6. Test the SyncPlay functionality to confirm the endpoint now properly validates group names and accepts bounded input sizes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jellyfin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35034 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data