CVE-2026-35052
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Tale is the combination of a Flask back-end and a React front-end to view & analyze Pandas data structures. Prior to 3.22.0, users hosting D-Tale publicly while using a redis or shelf storage layer could be vulnerable to remote code execution allowing attackers to run malicious code on the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.22.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceD-Tale versions prior to 3.22.0 contain a remote code execution vulnerability when publicly hosted with redis or shelf storage backends. The vulnerability allows attackers to execute malicious code on the server through the storage layer, likely due to insecure deserialization or improper input sanitization when storing and retrieving data through these storage mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.22.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed D-Tale versionRun 'pip show d-tale' or check your package manager to determine the installed version of D-TaleAffected if The installed version is lower than 3.22.0
-
Locate D-Tale storage configurationInspect your D-Tale configuration files and environment variables for storage backend settings, looking for redis or shelf related configurationsAffected if redis or shelf storage backends are enabled or configured
-
Check if redis is actively usedVerify whether redis connection settings are present in your D-Tale deployment configuration or environment, and confirm redis service is running and accessible to D-TaleAffected if redis storage is connected and actively in use with a vulnerable D-Tale version
-
Verify network accessibilityDetermine if your D-Tale instance is exposed to public or untrusted networks by checking firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or network ACLsAffected if D-Tale is publicly accessible (Internet-facing) AND uses redis or shelf storage with a version below 3.22.0
You are affected if your D-Tale version is below 3.22.0 AND you have redis or shelf storage enabled while the service is publicly accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.22.0
Upgrade D-Tale to version 3.22.0 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, avoid hosting D-Tale publicly and disable redis or shelf storage configurations until the patch can be applied.
3.22.0
- Upgrade D-Tale to version 3.22.0 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35052 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data