CVE-2026-35074
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerProtect Data Domain Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6.0.0 and version 8.7.0.0, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.20, and LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.60 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command Injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell PowerProtect Data Domain contains an OS command injection vulnerability due to improper neutralization of special elements in input. A high-privileged attacker with local access can exploit this to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.9>= 7.7.1.0, < 7.13.1.70>= 7.14.0.0, < 8.3.1.30>= 8.4.0.0, <= 8.6.1.10= 8.7.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed product and versionRun the command to display the Data Domain or PowerProtect appliance system version (e.g., 'software show' or check the system management interface for the OS version)Affected if The version displayed is lower than 2.7.9 for PowerProtect DP Series, or falls within the DDOS ranges 7.7.1.0-7.13.1.69, 7.14.0.0-8.3.1.29, 8.4.0.0-8.6.1.10, or equals exactly 8.7.0.0
-
Confirm the exact DDOS version numberUse 'version' or 'system show version' command on the Data Domain CLI, or check the About/System Info page in the management GUIAffected if The version begins with 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12, 7.13 (below .70), 7.14, 7.15, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 (below .30), 8.4, 8.5, 8.6 (at or below .10), or 8.7.0.0 exactly
-
Verify PowerProtect DP Appliance versionCheck the DP Series Appliance version through the management console or CLI (e.g., 'show system' or 'version' command)Affected if The installed DP Series Appliance version is any version prior to 2.7.9 (for example, 2.7.8, 2.7.0, 2.6.x, etc.)
-
Determine if local privileged access existsReview which accounts have root or administrative privileges on the system, and verify which users can access the local console or SSH with high-privileged credentialsAffected if The system allows local high-privileged accounts that could potentially exploit the command injection flaw (this condition is satisfied for any affected version above)
You are affected if your Dell PowerProtect DP Series Appliance is below version 2.7.9, or your Dell Data Domain Operating System version is within any of the ranges: 7.7.1.0-7.13.1.69, 7.14.0.0-8.3.1.29, 8.4.0.0-8.6.1.10, or exactly 8.7.0.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.7.97.13.1.708.3.1.30
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for the affected versions (7.7.1.0-8.7.0.0, LTS2025 8.3.1.0-8.3.1.20, LTS2024 7.13.1.0-7.13.1.60) to remediate the command injection flaw.
PowerProtect DP Series Appliance: 2.7.9+ | Data Domain OS: 7.13.1.70+, 8.3.1.30+, 8.6.1.20+, or latest 8.8.x+
- 1. Identify the exact Data Domain Operating System (DDOS) version currently installed using the 'version' command or via the DD Management Console
- 2. For PowerProtect DP Series Appliance: Upgrade to version 2.7.9 or later from Dell support portal
- 3. For Data Domain OS: Determine which version branch you are on (7.7.x, 7.13.x, 7.14.x, 8.3.x, 8.4.x, 8.5.x, 8.6.x, or 8.7.x)
- 4. For DDOS 7.7.x - 7.13.x: Upgrade to version 7.13.1.70 or later
- 5. For DDOS 7.14.x - 8.3.x: Upgrade to version 8.3.1.30 or later
- 6. For DDOS 8.4.x - 8.6.x: Upgrade to version 8.6.1.20 or later (if available) or migrate to a supported release
- 7. For DDOS 8.7.x: Upgrade to the latest available DDOS release (8.8.x or later recommended)
- 8. Schedule maintenance window and backup current configuration
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35074 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35074 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data