CVE-2026-35080
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ugw-restoreinfo method allows a remote attacker with user privileges to delete arbitrary local files due to insufficient validation of user-controlled input.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in the ugw-restoreinfo method allows any authenticated remote user to delete arbitrary files on the local system due to insufficient validation of user-controlled input used in file path construction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6_00_07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify firmware versionCheck the installed Mbs Solutions Universal Gateway Firmware version through the system info panel, CLI command, or firmware metadata file. Compare this version against the affected range of < 6_00_07.Affected if The installed firmware version is any version lower than 6_00_07.
-
Locate the ugw-restoreinfo methodSearch the application filesystem for the ugw-restoreinfo method, handler, or endpoint definition. This may be in the web application routing configuration, API definitions, or application source code directories.Affected if The ugw-restoreinfo method exists and is present in the deployed application.
-
Verify method accessibilityDetermine whether the ugw-restoreinfo method is exposed via the web interface, API, or CLI. Check the access control configuration, routing rules, or method visibility settings.Affected if The method is accessible without proper authentication or authorization controls.
-
Inspect path parameter handlingExamine the source code or configuration of the ugw-restoreinfo method to see how path parameters are processed. Look for direct use of user-supplied input in file deletion operations without sanitization or validation.Affected if The method accepts path parameters and uses them directly in file operations without validation or path normalization.
-
Review input validation configurationCheck if there are any allowlist validation rules, path normalization settings, or directory restriction configurations applied to the ugw-restoreinfo method or the broader file operation subsystem.Affected if No strict input validation, path allowlisting, or directory restrictions are configured for file deletion operations.
A user is affected if running firmware version lower than 6_00_07 with the ugw-restoreinfo method exposed and lacking proper input validation on path parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6_00_07
Implement strict allowlist-based input validation and canonicalize file paths to prevent directory traversal before using them in file deletion operations.
Universal Gateway Firmware version 6_00_07
- 1. Identify all Universal Gateway devices running firmware versions prior to 6_00_07
- 2. Access the device management interface and navigate to the firmware version check (typically in System > Firmware or Administration > Software Update)
- 3. Download the firmware version 6_00_07 or later from the vendor's official support portal
- 4. Initiate the firmware upgrade process following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
- 5. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is 6_00_07 or higher
- 6. Test the ugw-restoreinfo functionality to confirm the fix is working properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35080 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35080 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data