CVE-2026-35093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in libinput. A local attacker who can place a specially crafted Lua bytecode file in certain system or user configuration directories can bypass security restrictions. This allows the attacker to run unauthorized code with the same permissions as the program using libinput, such as a graphical compositor. This could lead to the attacker monitoring keyboard input and sending that information to an external location.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencelibinput loads Lua bytecode configuration files from system or user directories. A local attacker who can write to these configuration directories can place malicious Lua bytecode that gets executed with the privileges of the libinput-using program (e.g., graphical compositor), enabling keyboard monitoring and exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 43= 44< 1.30.3>= 1.30.4, < 1.31.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libinput versionRun 'libinput --version' or check your package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q libinput' on Fedora/RHEL, 'dpkg -l libinput' on Debian/Ubuntu)Affected if Version is < 1.30.3, OR >= 1.30.4 AND < 1.31.1, OR matches Fedora 43 or 44
-
Locate libinput configuration directoriesCheck for the presence of configuration directories: typically ~/.config/libinput/ (user) and /etc/libinput/ or /usr/share/libinput/ (system). Look for any .lua files in these locationsAffected if Lua configuration files (.lua) exist in libinput configuration directories
-
Inspect file permissions on configuration directoriesRun 'ls -la' on ~/.config/libinput/ and /etc/libinput/ (or /usr/share/libinput/) to verify write permissions. Check if directories are writable by non-root usersAffected if Configuration directories or Lua files are writable by unprivileged users or groups
-
Determine if libinput loads user configurationsReview libinput documentation or test if libinput reads from user configuration paths during normal operation. Check compositor logs for libinput configuration loadingAffected if Libinput is configured to load configuration files from user-writable paths
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable libinput version AND has writable Lua configuration files in directories that libinput reads during operation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.30.31.31.1
Restrict write permissions on libinput configuration directories to prevent unauthorized file placement; remove any untrusted Lua bytecode files from configuration locations; update libinput if a security patch is available.
libinput >= 1.31.1; Fedora packages containing fixed libinput
- Identify the current libinput version installed (e.g., 'rpm -q libinput' or 'libinput --version')
- For Fedora systems: Run 'sudo dnf update libinput' to apply the latest available package
- Alternatively, manually upgrade libinput to version 1.31.1 or later from source: Download from https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/releases
- Verify the fix by checking 'libinput --version' shows version 1.31.1 or higher
- Ensure any programs using libinput (e.g., desktop compositors, display managers) are restarted to load the updated library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data