CVE-2026-35423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read in Telnet Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in a Telnet Client implementation, allowing an attacker to read memory beyond allocated buffers. This could enable disclosure of sensitive information such as credentials, session data, or other memory contents during Telnet communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9140< 10.0.17763.8755< 10.0.19044.7291< 10.0.19045.7291< 10.0.22631.7079< 10.0.26100.8390< 10.0.26200.8390< 10.0.28000.2113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Telnet Client is installedRun 'dism /online /get-features | findstr TelnetClient' in Command Prompt or check Programs and Features > Windows Features > Telnet ClientAffected if Telnet Client feature is installed or enabled on the system
-
Verify Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows build numberAffected if The installed Windows build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9140, 17763.8755, 19044.7291, 19045.7291, 22631.7079, 26100.8390, 26200.8390, or 28000.2113 depending on the Windows edition and feature update version
-
Check for Telnet usage or configurationReview network connection logs, check for any configured Telnet connections in remote administration tools, or examine command history for 'telnet' commandsAffected if Telnet has been actively used or configured to connect to remote hosts
-
Identify Telnet-related processesOpen Task Manager or run 'tasklist | findstr telnet' to list any running Telnet client processesAffected if A Telnet client process is currently active or has recently been executed
The environment is affected if Telnet Client is installed and the Windows version is below the fixed build numbers for the corresponding Windows release, combined with actual or recent Telnet usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.914010.0.17763.875510.0.19044.7291
Replace Telnet with SSH for remote access, as Telnet transmits data in plaintext. If Telnet use is required, apply any available vendor patches and restrict network access to trusted hosts.
Microsoft Windows Cumulative Update to the specified build number for your Windows version (e.g., 10.0.14393.9140 for Win10 1607, 10.0.17763.8755 for Win10 1809, etc.)
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows version and build you are running from the list of affected versions
- For Windows 10 1607: upgrade to build 10.0.14393.9140 or later
- For Windows 10 1809: upgrade to build 10.0.17763.8755 or later
- For Windows 10 21h2: upgrade to build 10.0.19044.7291 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2: upgrade to build 10.0.19045.7291 or later
- For Windows 11 23h2: upgrade to build 10.0.22631.7079 or later
- For Windows 11 24h2: upgrade to build 10.0.26100.8390 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data