CVE-2026-35515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNest is a framework for building scalable Node.js server-side applications. Prior to 11.1.18, SseStream._transform() interpolates message.type and message.id directly into Server-Sent Events text protocol output without sanitizing newline characters (\r, \n). Since the SSE protocol treats both \r and \n as field delimiters and \n\n as event boundaries, an attacker who can influence these fields through upstream data sources can inject arbitrary SSE events, spoof event types, and corrupt reconnection state. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.1.18.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn NestJS versions prior to 11.1.18, the SseStream._transform() method interpolates message.type and message.id directly into Server-Sent Events (SSE) protocol output without sanitizing newline characters. Since SSE treats \r and \n as field delimiters and \n\n as event boundaries, an attacker who can control these fields through upstream data sources can inject arbitrary SSE events, spoof event types, and corrupt client reconnection state.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.1.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed NestJS versionRun 'npm list @nestjs/core' or 'npm list nest' in your project directory to see the installed version of NestJSAffected if The installed version is lower than 11.1.18
-
Identify SseStream usage in codebaseSearch your codebase for imports of SseStream from @nestjs/platform-sse or usage of ServerSentEventsModule, and review files that instantiate or extend SseStreamAffected if Your application uses SseStream to handle Server-Sent Events responses
-
Verify message.type and message.id sourcesLocate code where SseStream._transform() is called or where message objects with 'type' and 'id' properties are passed to the SSE stream; trace these values back to their origin (user input, database, API, etc.)Affected if The message.type or message.id values come from untrusted or user-controlled sources without validation
-
Inspect SSE event output for newlinesCapture actual SSE responses from your endpoints and examine the raw output for any or characters within the 'id:' or 'type:' fieldsAffected if Raw SSE output contains unsanitized newline characters in event id or type fields
-
Check for upstream sanitizationSearch for any input validation, sanitization, or escaping logic applied to SSE message.type or message.id values before they reach SseStream (look for regex replacements, character stripping, or validation functions)Affected if No sanitization logic exists for newlines in message.type or message.id before SSE output
You are affected if your NestJS version is below 11.1.18 AND your application uses SseStream with message.type or message.id values sourced from untrusted input without sanitizing newline characters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.1.18
Upgrade NestJS to version 11.1.18 or later, which includes sanitization of newline characters in SseStream._transform(). Until then, validate and sanitize all message.type and message.id values at upstream sources to remove or escape \r and \n characters.
NestJS framework to version 11.1.18
- 1. Check current Nest package version in your project by running: npm list @nestjs/core
- 2. Update the NestJS package to version 11.1.18 by running: npm install @nestjs/[email protected]
- 3. If using other NestJS packages, update them to compatible 11.x versions: npm install @nestjs/[email protected] @nestjs/[email protected]
- 4. Verify the installation was successful: npm list @nestjs/core
- 5. Run your test suite to ensure the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- 6. Rebuild and deploy your application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data