CVE-2026-35547
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen processing the header of an incoming message, libnv failed to properly validate the message size. The lack of validation allows a malicious program to write outside the bounds of a heap allocation. This can trigger a crash or system panic, and it may be possible for an unprivileged user to exploit the bug to elevate their privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencelibnv library lacks proper validation of message size fields in incoming message headers before allocating heap memory and copying data. This allows an attacker to trigger a heap buffer overflow by providing a crafted message with a size value larger than the allocated buffer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.5= 14.3= 14.4= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the FreeBSD versionRun 'uname -a' or 'freebsd-version -u' to determine the installed FreeBSD versionAffected if The version matches 13.5, 14.3, 14.4, or 15.0 exactly
-
Locate libnv library on the systemRun 'find / -name "libnv*" -type f 2>/dev/null' to find libnv library filesAffected if The libnv library is present on the system
-
Identify services or applications using libnvRun 'ldd /bin/* /usr/bin/* 2>/dev/null | grep libnv' or check running processes that may link against libnvAffected if Any executable is linked against libnv and handles incoming network or inter-process messages
-
Check for exposed network services using libnvReview running network services with 'sockstat -4l' or 'sockstat -6l' and correlate with libnv-using applicationsAffected if A service that uses libnv is bound to a network interface and may receive untrusted messages
-
Inspect message handling configurationsExamine configuration files for services using libnv to determine if they accept external inputAffected if The libnv-using service is configured to accept remote or untrusted client connections
You are affected if you are running FreeBSD 13.5, 14.3, 14.4, or 15.0 and have any service or application linked against libnv that handles external or untrusted message input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement rigorous bounds checking on all message size fields before heap allocation. Validate that the claimed message size does not exceed the maximum expected size and matches the actual buffer allocation.
FreeBSD 15.1 or latest stable branch
- Check current FreeBSD version with: uname -a
- Plan a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Backup all critical data and configuration files
- For production systems, test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Upgrade FreeBSD to the latest stable release (15.1 or newer) using freebsd-update or source rebuild
- Reboot the system into the new kernel
- Verify the libnv library has been updated and the vulnerability is resolved
- Verify all services start correctly after reboot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35547 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data