CVE-2026-35552
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn CAXperts UPVWebServices 2.4.2212.603 through 2.7.6 and UDiTH Portal 2026.0.0 through 2026.2.0, an authenticated remote user can invoke an administrative API endpoint intended for privileged users. Due to missing authorization checks, this allows the attacker to deactivate the application's license.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Broken Access Control vulnerability where authenticated non-privileged users can invoke administrative API endpoints due to missing authorization validation. An attacker with standard user credentials can access a privileged administrative function to deactivate the application's license, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CAXperts product deploymentIdentify whether UPVWebServices or UDiTH Portal from CAXperts is installed in your environment. Check application inventory, running services, or installed packages for CAXperts-related components.Affected if CAXperts UPVWebServices or UDiTH Portal is present in the environment
-
Locate the license deactivation API endpointFind the API endpoint responsible for license deactivation within the CAXperts application. Review API documentation, source code, or intercept network traffic to identify endpoints handling license operations (keywords: license, deactivate).Affected if A license deactivation endpoint exists and is accessible via the API
-
Test access with non-privileged userAuthenticate to the application using an account without administrative privileges. Send a request to the license deactivation endpoint and verify whether the operation completes successfully without proper authorization.Affected if A non-privileged authenticated user can successfully invoke the license deactivation function
-
Verify authorization configurationInspect the source code or configuration for the license management API endpoint to determine whether role-based access control or privilege level verification is implemented before allowing license deactivation.Affected if No authorization check exists to verify user privilege level before license deactivation
The environment is affected if CAXperts UPVWebServices or UDiTH Portal is deployed and non-privileged users can successfully deactivate the license through the API without authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement role-based access control (RBAC) with explicit authorization checks on all administrative API endpoints to verify the user has sufficient privileges before executing sensitive operations like license management.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35552 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35552 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data