CVE-2026-35565
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Unsanitized Topology Metadata in Apache Storm UI Versions Affected: before 2.8.6 Description: The Storm UI visualization component interpolates topology metadata including component IDs, stream names, and grouping values directly into HTML via innerHTML in parseNode() and parseEdge() without sanitization at any layer. An authenticated user with topology submission rights could craft a topology containing malicious HTML/JavaScript in component identifiers (e.g., a bolt ID containing an onerror event handler). This payload flows through Nimbus → Thrift → the Visualization API → vis.js tooltip rendering, resulting in stored cross-site scripting. In multi-tenant deployments where topology submission is available to less-trusted users but the UI is accessed by operators or administrators, this enables privilege escalation through script execution in an admin's browser session. Mitigation: 2.x users should upgrade to 2.8.6. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should monkey-patch the parseNode() and parseEdge() functions in the visualization JavaScript file to HTML-escape all API-supplied values including nodeId, :capacity, :latency, :component, :stream, and :grouping before interpolation into tooltip HTML strings, and should additionally restrict topology submission to trusted users via Nimbus ACLs as a defense-in-depth measure. A guide on how to do this is available in the release notes of 2.8.6. Credit: This issue was discovered while investigating another report by K.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Apache Storm UI where the visualization component uses innerHTML to render topology metadata (component IDs, stream names, grouping values) from parseNode() and parseEdge() functions without sanitization. Authenticated users with topology submission rights can inject malicious HTML/JavaScript (e.g., onerror event handlers) that executes when administrators view the topology in the UI.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.8.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache Storm versionRun 'storm version' command or inspect the storm-core JAR file version in the Storm lib directoryAffected if Version is 2.0.0 through 2.8.5 (any version >= 2.0.0 and < 2.8.6)
-
Verify Storm UI is accessibleConfirm the Storm web UI is accessible on the configured port (typically 8080)Affected if Storm UI is exposed to users who can submit topologies or view topology visualizations
-
Inspect Nimbus ACL configurationExamine the storm.yaml configuration file for nimbus.authorizer settings and any defined ACLsAffected if No ACLs are configured, or ACLs permit untrusted users to submit topologies
-
Review topology submission accessCheck if users other than trusted administrators have topology submission rights via Nimbus ACLsAffected if Untrusted or low-privilege users can submit topologies to the Storm cluster
You are affected if your Storm version is >= 2.0.0 and < 2.8.6 AND the UI is accessible to users who can submit topologies without proper ACL restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.8.6
Upgrade to Apache Storm 2.8.6 or monkey-patch parseNode() and parseEdge() to HTML-escape all API-supplied values before DOM insertion; additionally restrict topology submission via Nimbus ACLs as defense-in-depth.
2.8.6
- Download Apache Storm version 2.8.6 from the official Apache Storm distribution (storm.apache.org)
- Stop all running Storm services (Nimbus, Supervisors, Workers, Storm UI)
- Back up your current Storm configuration and any custom settings
- Replace the existing Storm installation with version 2.8.6 files
- Restore your backed-up configuration files to the new installation
- Restart Storm services in the correct order: Zookeeper (if embedded), Nimbus, Supervisors, Workers, then Storm UI
- Verify the upgrade by logging into Storm UI and confirming version 2.8.6 is displayed
- Test topology submission to confirm normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35565 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35565 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data