CVE-2026-3590
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.12, 11.5.x <= 11.5.0, 11.4.x <= 11.4.2, 11.3.x <= 11.3.2 fail to enforce atomic single-use consumption of guest magic link tokens, which allows an attacker with access to a valid magic link to establish multiple independent authenticated sessions via concurrent requests.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00624
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to atomically consume guest magic link tokens, allowing the same token to be used for multiple concurrent authentication requests. This race condition enables an attacker with a valid token to establish multiple independent authenticated sessions instead of being limited to single-use.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.13>= 11.3.0, < 11.3.3>= 11.4.0, < 11.4.3>= 11.5.0, < 11.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Mattermost Server versionRun 'mmctl version' or check the System Console > About page for the server version numberAffected if Version is 10.11.0-10.11.12, 11.3.0-11.3.2, 11.4.0-11.4.2, or 11.5.0 (any build before 10.11.13, 11.3.3, 11.4.3, or 11.5.1)
-
Determine if guest accounts are enabledNavigate to System Console > User Management > Guests, or check config.json for 'GuestAccountsSettings.Enable' set to trueAffected if Guest accounts feature is enabled and magic link invitations are in use
-
Verify magic link token configurationCheck System Console > Authentication > Email > Enable sign up with email, or review config.json for 'EmailSettings.EnableSignUpWithEmail' and guest invitation settingsAffected if Email-based sign-up and guest invitations are configured
-
Confirm guest invitation methodReview invitation emails sent to guest users containing magic links, or check if 'EmailSettings.EnableSignInWithEmail' is true in configurationAffected if Guest users receive magic link tokens for authentication
You are affected if your Mattermost Server version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges AND guest magic link invitations are enabled in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1311.3.311.4.3
Upgrade to patched Mattermost versions (10.11.13+, 11.5.1+, 11.4.3+, 11.3.3+) or implement application-layer rate limiting on magic link token validation as a temporary workaround.
Upgrade to 10.11.13 (for 10.11.x branch), 11.3.3 (for 11.3.x branch), 11.4.3 (for 11.4.x branch), or 11.5.1 (for 11.5.x branch) - choose the version corresponding to your current branch
- 1. Identify the currently running Mattermost Server version using the system console or mmctl command
- 2. Based on your current version, determine the appropriate upgrade target: 10.11.x users upgrade to 10.11.13, 11.3.x users upgrade to 11.3.3, 11.4.x users upgrade to 11.4.3, or 11.5.x users upgrade to 11.5.1
- 3. Back up the Mattermost database and configuration files before upgrading
- 4. Download the appropriate Mattermost Server fixed release from the official Mattermost download page
- 5. Follow Mattermost upgrade documentation to install the new version - typically involves stopping the server, replacing binaries, and restarting
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the server version in the system console
- 7. Test that guest magic link authentication works correctly and that tokens are consumed atomically (single-use)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3590 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3590 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data