CVE-2026-3643
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Accessibly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the REST API in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.3. The plugin registers REST API endpoints at `/otm-ac/v1/update-widget-options` and `/otm-ac/v1/update-app-config` with the `permission_callback` set to `__return_true`, which means no authentication or authorization check is performed. The `updateWidgetOptions()` function in `AdminApi.php` accepts user-supplied JSON data and passes it directly to `AccessiblyOptions::updateAppConfig()`, which saves it to the WordPress options table via `update_option()` without any sanitization or validation. The stored `widgetSrc` value is later retrieved by `AssetsManager::enqueueFrontendScripts()` and passed directly to `wp_enqueue_script()` as the script URL, causing it to be rendered as a `<script>` tag on every front-end page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes for all site visitors by changing the `widgetSrc` option to point to a malicious external script.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Accessibly WordPress plugin has a critical Stored XSS vulnerability where unauthenticated attackers can inject arbitrary JavaScript via the REST API endpoints `/otm-ac/v1/update-widget-options` and `/otm-ac/v1/update-app-config`. These endpoints lack authentication checks (permission_callback set to __return_true) and accept user-supplied JSON that gets stored without sanitization. The widgetSrc option value is later directly used in wp_enqueue_script(), causing the injected script to execute on every front-end page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Accessibly plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Accessibly' or check the plugins directory at /wp-content/plugins/ for an 'accessibly' folderAffected if The Accessibly plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed Accessibly versionIn WordPress admin plugins list, view the plugin details to see the installed version number. Compare against any known affected version rangeAffected if The plugin version falls within a vulnerable range where the REST API endpoints lack proper authentication
-
Test REST API endpoint accessibilitySend a GET request to /wp-json/otm-ac/v1/update-widget-options and /wp-json/otm-ac/v1/update-app-config using curl or a browser. Check if endpoints respond without requiring authenticationAffected if The endpoints return a response (even an error) indicating they exist and are accessible without authentication (permission_callback is __return_true)
-
Inspect stored option values in databaseQuery the wp_options table for option_name values containing 'widgetSrc' or similar using: SELECT * FROM wp_options WHERE option_name LIKE '%widget%'. Check if the option_value contains unexpected URLs or script tagsAffected if The widgetSrc or related option contains a value that was not set through legitimate admin interface, or contains javascript: or <script> tags
-
Check for unauthorized script enqueuingView page source of any frontend page and search for script tags with sources that do not match expected Accessibly functionality. Also check wp_enqueue_script calls in plugin code for unsanitized widgetSrc usageAffected if Scripts are being loaded from unexpected domains or the widgetSrc option is being directly enqueued without validation
A user is affected if the Accessibly plugin is installed, the REST API endpoints are accessible without authentication, and the widgetSrc option in the database contains unexpected or malicious values that get directly enqueued as scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediate remediation requires: 1) adding proper authentication/authorization checks to the REST API endpoints, 2) implementing server-side sanitization and validation for all option values before storage, and 3) validating the widgetSrc URL before enqueueing. Until the patch is applied, consider disabling the plugin or restricting access to these endpoints at the server level.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3643 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3643 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data