CVE-2026-36605
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMercusys AC12G (EU) V1 router with firmware AC12G(EU)_V1_200909 is vulnerable to a HTTP denial of service via a low number of crafted incomplete HTTP requests, causing a persistent crash that requires physical power cycling to recover.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Mercusys AC12G V1 router's HTTP server crashes when receiving a small number of malformed incomplete HTTP requests, causing a persistent denial of service that requires physical power cycling to recover. The vulnerability is in the embedded HTTP daemon which fails to handle edge cases in HTTP request parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router admin panel or check the device label to confirm it is a Mercusys AC12G V1 routerAffected if The device is NOT a Mercusys AC12G V1 model
-
Check firmware versionLog into the router web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1) and navigate to Status or System settings to view the firmware version, or use the command 'cat /proc/version' via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if Firmware version matches AC12G(EU)_V1_200909 exactly or falls within the affected range around this version
-
Verify HTTP service is enabledIn the router admin panel, check under Advanced or Security settings for HTTP remote management settings, or scan the router's WAN IP on port 80/tcpAffected if HTTP service is enabled and accessible (WAN or LAN)
-
Confirm device accessibilityAttempt to access the router login page via HTTP on the expected IP addressAffected if Router web interface is reachable via HTTP, indicating the vulnerable service is running
You are affected if you have a Mercusys AC12G V1 router running firmware version AC12G(EU)_V1_200909 (or a comparable version) with the HTTP service enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware update when available; until then, isolate the device behind a firewall with rate limiting or consider replacement with a supported device.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-36605 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-36605 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data