Unrestricted File UploadWeakness · CWE-434

CVE-2026-36722

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An authenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the /api/create-car-image component of bookcars v8.3 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

bookcars v8.3 contains an authenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the /api/create-car-image endpoint. An authenticated attacker can upload crafted files (e.g., malicious PHP scripts) to the server and execute arbitrary code by accessing the uploaded file.

MitigationImplement strict file type validation (whitelist approach), rename uploaded files, store them outside the web root, and disable script execution in the upload directory. Additionally, require strong authentication for this endpoint and implement file content analysis rather than relying solely on file extension checks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify bookcars version
    Locate the package.json file in the bookcars installation directory and check the 'version' field against v8.3 or compare to affected version range
    Affected if Installed version matches v8.3 or falls within the affected range
  2. Verify /api/create-car-image endpoint exists
    Check the backend source code for the presence of a route handler at /api/create-car-image, typically found in the routes or api folder
    Affected if The endpoint is defined and accessible in the application
  3. Confirm endpoint requires authentication
    Examine the route middleware for /api/create-car-image to determine if authentication middleware (such as authToken or similar) is applied
    Affected if Authentication is enforced but file validation is missing or insufficient
  4. Inspect file validation logic
    Review the file upload handler code within the create-car-image controller to identify what validation (if any) is performed on uploaded files (check for file type, extension, magic bytes)
    Affected if No file type validation, no extension allowlist, or no magic byte verification is implemented
  5. Check upload storage configuration
    Locate where uploaded files are stored (typically an uploads or media directory) and determine if it is within the webroot and if script execution is permitted
    Affected if Uploads are stored in a web-accessible directory with script execution enabled

Your environment is affected if you are running bookcars v8.3 (or an affected version), the /api/create-car-image endpoint is exposed, and uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location without proper validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict file type validation (whitelist approach), rename uploaded files, store them outside the web root, and disable script execution in the upload directory. Additionally, require strong authentication for this endpoint and implement file content analysis rather than relying solely on file extension checks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-36722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-36722 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data