Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionWeakness · CWE-400

CVE-2026-36724

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An uncaught exception in the /application/job/update/{id} endpoint of FastapiAdmin v2.2.0 allows authenticated attackers with the module_task:job:update permission to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via manipulating the func field of scheduled tasks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

FastapiAdmin v2.2.0 contains an uncaught exception in the /application/job/update/{id} endpoint. Authenticated attackers with the module_task:job:update permission can cause a denial of service by manipulating the func field of scheduled tasks, triggering an exception that crashes the application.

MitigationImplement proper exception handling in the job update endpoint and add input validation for the func field. Apply vendor patch when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FastapiAdmin version
    Check your installed FastapiAdmin package version using pip show fastapi-admin or check your requirements.txt/poetry.lock file for the installed version
    Affected if The installed version is v2.2.0 exactly, or falls within the v2.2.0 range without the security fix applied
  2. Verify job update endpoint exists
    Inspect your FastapiAdmin installation routing configuration or API OpenAPI schema to confirm the /application/job/update/{id} endpoint is registered
    Affected if The endpoint exists in the application routes, meaning the functionality is present and potentially exploitable
  3. Confirm module_task:job:update permission is enabled
    Check your permission/role configuration file or database to see if the module_task:job:update permission is defined and assignable to users
    Affected if The module_task:job:update permission exists in your permission system, allowing authenticated users to access the vulnerable endpoint
  4. Review func field handling in job update logic
    Examine the source code for the /application/job/update/{id} endpoint handler, specifically the portion that processes the func field input for scheduled tasks
    Affected if The code lacks try-except or similar exception handling around the func field processing logic, leaving unhandled exceptions possible
  5. Test endpoint behavior with malformed func input
    Send a crafted request to /application/job/update/{id} with an intentionally malformed or invalid func field value while authenticated with the required permission
    Affected if The request triggers an unhandled exception and causes the application to crash or return a 500 error without graceful handling

You are affected if FastapiAdmin v2.2.0 is installed, the /application/job/update/{id} endpoint is exposed, and the func field processing in that endpoint lacks proper exception handling, allowing a user with module_task:job:update permission to crash the application.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper exception handling in the job update endpoint and add input validation for the func field. Apply vendor patch when available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-36724 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-36724 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data