CVE-2026-36779
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedShenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd Tenda O3 Wireless Router v1.0.0.5(4180) was discovered to contain multiple stack overflows in the fromVirtualSer function via the puVar2, puVar1, __s2, __s1_00, and puVar3 parameters. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Tenda O3 router firmware v1.0.0.5(4180) within the fromVirtualSer function. Multiple parameters (puVar2, puVar1, __s2, __s1_00, puVar3) accept unchecked user input from HTTP requests and copy data to fixed-size stack buffers without proper length validation, allowing controlled overflow and device crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify router model and firmware versionAccess the router's web interface and check the system status page, or use the command 'cat /proc/version' or 'nvram get firmware_version' via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if The device is a Tenda O3 running firmware version v1.0.0.5(4180)
-
Verify fromVirtualSer function is exposedSend a crafted HTTP request to the router's web interface endpoint that triggers fromVirtualSer. This is typically a form submission to /goform/ or similar endpoint that the fromVirtualSer function handlesAffected if The router accepts HTTP requests to the endpoint that invokes fromVirtualSer and the function lacks input validation on the parameters (puVar2, puVar1, __s2, __s1_00, puVar3)
-
Check remote management statusLog into the router admin panel and navigate to Advanced Settings or System Settings to verify if remote web management or remote upgrade is enabledAffected if Remote management is enabled, exposing the vulnerable function to network attackers rather than only local LAN users
You are affected if you have a Tenda O3 router on firmware v1.0.0.5(4180) with the fromVirtualSer function accessible via HTTP and remote management enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, disable remote web management or restrict administrative interface access to trusted IPs only.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-36779 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-36779 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data