CVE-2026-3778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe application does not detect or guard against cyclic PDF object references while handling JavaScript in PDF. When pages and annotations are crafted that reference each other in a loop, passing the document to APIs (e.g., SOAP) that perform deep traversal can cause uncontrolled recursion, stack exhaustion, and application crashes.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in PDF object traversal where cyclic references between PDF pages and annotations cause unbounded recursion. When documents with mutually referencing objects are processed through deep traversal APIs (like SOAP), the application experiences stack exhaustion and crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.2.2.24014>= 14.0.0.33046, <= 14.0.2.33402>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687>= 2025.1.0.27937, <= 2025.3.0.35737<= 13.2.2.63349>= 14.0.0.68868, <= 14.0.2.69164>= 2023.1.0.55583, <= 2023.3.0.63083>= 2024.1.0.63682, <= 2024.4.1.66479>= 2025.1.0.66692, <= 2025.3.0.69570<= 2025.3.0.35737<= 2025.3.0.69570CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit PDF productOpen the application, then go to Help > About Foxit PDF Editor (or Reader) to view the exact version number. Alternatively, locate the executable file in Program Files and check its properties.Affected if The installed application is Foxit Pdf Editor or Foxit Pdf Reader
-
Compare version against affected rangesMatch your installed version number to the affected version list: Editor <= 13.2.2.24014; >= 14.0.0.33046 <= 14.0.2.33402; >= 2023.1.0.15510 <= 2023.3.0.23028; >= 2024.1.0.23997 <= 2024.4.1.27687; >= 2025.1.0.27937 <= 2025.3.0.35737; <= 13.2.2.63349; >= 14.0.0.68868 <= 14.0.2.69164; >= 2023.1.0.55583 <= 2023.3.0.63083; >= 2024.1.0.63682 <= 2024.4.1.66479; >= 2025.1.0.66692 <= 2025.3.0.69570. Reader <= 2025.3.0.35737 or <= 2025.3.0.69570.Affected if Your installed version falls within any of the listed affected ranges
-
Check for programmatic PDF processingReview any scripts, applications, or automation that invoke Foxit PDF products through SOAP, deep traversal APIs, or command-line operations that process untrusted PDF documents.Affected if Your environment uses Foxit to process PDF documents through traversal APIs or SOAP interfaces with documents that may contain cyclic object references
You are affected if you have Foxit PDF Editor or Reader installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND you process PDF documents containing cyclic references through deep traversal or SOAP APIs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement cycle detection using a visited-object tracking set and enforce recursion depth limits in PDF traversal APIs, or refactor recursive traversal to use iterative approaches with explicit stack management.
For Pdf Editor: upgrade to version > 2024.4.1.27687 (latest 2024.x or 2025.x release); For Pdf Reader: upgrade to version > 2025.3.0.69570 (latest release)
- 1. Identify the exact Foxit product installed (Pdf Editor or Pdf Reader) and current version number
- 2. Navigate to the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com) and locate the downloads or support section
- 3. Download the latest version of the installed product
- 4. Uninstall the current version of Foxit Pdf Editor or Pdf Reader
- 5. Install the latest downloaded version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data