CVE-2026-37982
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Keycloak. This authentication vulnerability allows a remote attacker to replay `ExecuteActionsActionToken` tokens within Keycloak's WebAuthn (Web Authentication) flow. By intercepting an execute-actions email link, an attacker can register their own authenticator to a victim's account. This leads to unauthorized enrollment of a hardware-backed credential, enabling persistent account takeover.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKeycloak suffers from a token replay vulnerability in its WebAuthn flow where ExecuteActionsActionToken tokens can be replayed by attackers who intercept the execute-actions email link. This allows the attacker to register their own hardware-backed authenticator to the victim's account, achieving persistent account takeover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 26.4, < 26.4.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Keycloak versionCheck the installed version of Red Hat Build of Keycloak by reviewing the RPM package (rpm -q) or the $KEYCLOAK_HOME/src/main/resources/product.xml file, or by querying the Keycloak admin console server info endpointAffected if The installed version is greater than or equal to 26.4 but less than 26.4.12
-
Confirm WebAuthn authentication is enabledIn Keycloak admin console, navigate to Authentication > Flows and verify if the WebAuthn Authenticator flow is active, or check realm configuration files for webauthn-enabled: true settingsAffected if WebAuthn authentication is enabled in the realm configuration
-
Verify ExecuteActionsActionToken configurationCheck the Keycloak realm configuration or authentication flow settings for ExecuteActionsActionToken token settings. This can be done via the admin REST API at /admin/realms/{realm} or by inspecting the keycloak-server.json configurationAffected if ExecuteActionsActionToken is configured without single-use enforcement or replay protection for WebAuthn enrollment flows
-
Inspect email action token settingsReview the token lifecycle settings in the Keycloak server configuration (keycloak-server.json or standalone.xml) for action token validity periods and replay protection settings related to the execute-actions endpointAffected if Token replay protection is not explicitly configured or is disabled for action tokens used in WebAuthn enrollment
You are affected if you run Red Hat Build of Keycloak versions 26.4 through 26.4.11 with WebAuthn authentication enabled and the ExecuteActionsActionToken lacks proper single-use replay protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped26.4.12
Implement token replay protection by ensuring ExecuteActionsActionToken tokens are single-use, properly expire, and validate token uniqueness during the WebAuthn enrollment flow. Additionally, consider implementing additional email verification steps before allowing WebAuthn credential enrollment.
Keycloak 26.4.12
- Upgrade Keycloak to version 26.4.12 or later to remediate this vulnerability
- After upgrading, review all ExecuteActionsActionToken email flows to ensure no malicious authenticator registrations occurred
- As a security precaution, consider invalidating and re-registering WebAuthn credentials for affected users
- Monitor for any unauthorized authenticator enrollments in audit logs
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-37982 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-37982 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data