CVE-2026-38728
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Nodemailer smtp_server before v.3.18.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the SMTPStream._write, lib/smtp-stream.js components
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Nodemailer's smtp_server module prior to version 3.18.3. The vulnerability is located in the SMTPStream._write function within lib/smtp-stream.js, where specially crafted SMTP data from a remote attacker can trigger the DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify smtp_server installationRun 'npm list smtp_server' in your project directory to list the installed smtp_server package and its versionAffected if smtp_server is not listed in node_modules or returns a version prior to 3.18.3
-
Verify package.json dependencyCheck your package.json file for the smtp_server dependency entry and compare the version range to the vulnerable versions (< 3.18.3)Affected if package.json specifies smtp_server with a version less than 3.18.3
-
Inspect vulnerable source fileLocate lib/smtp-stream.js within the smtp_server module directory and verify the SMTPStream._write function exists (this confirms the vulnerable component is present)Affected if The file lib/smtp-stream.js exists and contains the SMTPStream._write function
-
Determine active SMTP server exposureCheck your application code for instances where smtp_server is imported and the server is started (e.g., Server.listen or similar calls), and verify network exposure of the SMTP portAffected if Your application code starts an SMTP server using smtp_server and the port is accessible to untrusted network sources
You are affected if smtp_server version is lower than 3.18.3 and your application runs an SMTP server using the vulnerable module that is accessible to remote attackers sending specially crafted SMTP data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade smtp_server to version 3.18.3 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement rate limiting on SMTP connections and restrict network exposure to trusted sources.
smtp_server v3.18.3 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of smtp_server in your project by checking package.json or running `npm list smtp_server`
- 2. If using npm, run `npm update smtp_server` to upgrade to the latest version
- 3. Alternatively, install the specific fixed version by running: `npm install [email protected]`
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `npm list smtp_server` and confirming the version is 3.18.3 or later
- 5. Test your email functionality to ensure the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- 6. Rebuild and redeploy your application with the updated dependency
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-38728 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-38728 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data