CVE-2026-38740
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFoscam VD1 Video Doorbell before V5.3.13_1072 is vulnerable to Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information. The device transmits sensitive Session Description Protocol (SDP), including ICE credentials and candidates, in cleartext over network interfaces. An attacker with network visibility can intercept these credentials to hijack media streams or authenticate to Foscam's TURN/relay infrastructure to forward arbitrary traffic at the vendor's expense.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Foscam VD1 Video Doorbell transmits Session Description Protocol (SDP) data containing ICE credentials and candidates in cleartext over network interfaces prior to version V5.3.13_1072. An attacker with network visibility can intercept these credentials to hijack media streams or authenticate to Foscam's TURN/relay infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the firmware version of the Foscam VD1Access the Foscam mobile app or the device web interface and navigate to Settings > Device Info > Firmware Version. Alternatively, check the device label or documentation.Affected if The firmware version is earlier than V5.3.13_1072, indicating the device is running a vulnerable version.
-
Verify if unencrypted media streaming is enabledIn the Foscam app or web interface, navigate to Network or Video settings and check whether encryption settings for live view or peer-to-peer streaming are disabled or set to optional.Affected if Encryption is disabled or optional, allowing cleartext transmission of media stream metadata.
-
Inspect network traffic for cleartext SDP packetsUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the local network to capture traffic to and from the doorbell's IP address. Filter for SIP or RTSP traffic and examine the SDP payload within the packets.Affected if SDP packets contain ICE candidates, usernames, and passwords transmitted in plaintext (not over TLS or DTLS).
-
Check for direct peer-to-peer connection settingsIn the Foscam app settings, look for P2P or NAT traversal settings. If the device is configured to use automatic or easy connection modes without forced encryption, it may be using unencrypted paths.Affected if P2P or NAT traversal is enabled without explicit TLS/DTLS enforcement.
A defender is affected if their Foscam VD1 doorbell runs firmware earlier than V5.3.13_1072 and transmits unencrypted SDP data containing ICE credentials over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Foscam VD1 firmware to version V5.3.13_1072 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to trusted parties and monitor for unauthorized media stream interception.
V5.3.13_1072
- 1. Check the current firmware version of the Foscam VD1 Video Doorbell through the device management interface or Foscam mobile app
- 2. Navigate to the official Foscam support website or firmware download section
- 3. Download the fixed firmware version V5.3.13_1072 for the VD1 Video Doorbell
- 4. Access the device settings via web interface or mobile app and locate the firmware update section
- 5. Upload and apply the V5.3.13_1072 firmware update to the device
- 6. Verify the update was successful by confirming the new firmware version in the device settings
- 7. After updating, verify that media stream connections now use encrypted transmission (TLS/DTLS)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-38740 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-38740 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data