CVE-2026-38940
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross Site Scripting vulnerability in RafyMrX TOKO-ONLINE-ROTI v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the detail_produk.php component
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the detail_produk.php component of RafyMrX TOKO-ONLINE-ROTI v1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users, potentially stealing session cookies or performing actions on behalf of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm application presenceSearch the web root directory for the presence of 'TOKO-ONLINE-ROTI' or 'RafyMrX' directory structure, specifically looking for detail_produk.phpAffected if The file detail_produk.php exists in the web application directory
-
Identify application versionCheck for version indicators such as a README file, version comment in source files, or a meta tag indicating v1.0Affected if The application version is v1.0 or if version cannot be determined but detail_produk.php exists
-
Locate vulnerable fileLocate detail_produk.php in the web application hierarchy, typically under the main application directoryAffected if detail_produk.php is present and accessible via web request
-
Check for unfiltered parametersReview the source code of detail_produk.php for GET/POST parameters that are echoed back to the page without proper sanitization (e.g., using $_GET or $_POST directly in HTML output)Affected if User-supplied parameters are output without HTML encoding or input validation
-
Test XSS in running applicationSend a crafted request to detail_produk.php with a test payload such as <script>alert('XSS')</script> in suspected parameter (commonly 'id', 'produk', or 'product_id') and observe if it executes in the responseAffected if The test payload renders as literal HTML/script instead of being encoded or filtered
The environment is affected if detail_prokid.php from RafyMrX TOKO-ONLINE-ROTI v1.0 is present and user-supplied input in that file is reflected in web pages without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in detail_produk.php; utilize context-aware escaping and consider implementing a Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS risks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-38940 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-38940 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data