CVE-2026-39054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOinone Pamirs 7.0.0 contains a command injection vulnerability in CommandHelper.executeCommands. The method starts a shell process and writes attacker-controlled command strings directly to the process standard input without sanitization. In affected deployments, this can result in arbitrary operating system command execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOinone Pamirs 7.0.0 contains a command injection vulnerability in CommandHelper.executeCommands. The method starts a shell process and writes attacker-controlled command strings directly to the process standard input without sanitization, allowing arbitrary OS command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oinone Pamirs installationLocate the Oinone Pamirs application directory or JAR files. Check for presence of pamirs-core or pamirs related JARs in the application classpath.Affected if Oinone Pamirs software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionCheck the version manifest, pom.xml, or version file within the Pamirs installation directory. Look for version 7.0.0 specifically.Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.0.0
-
Locate CommandHelper classSearch the application codebase or JAR files for the class named CommandHelper. Inspect the executeCommands method to confirm it exists.Affected if The CommandHelper.executeCommands method is present in the codebase
-
Verify shell process invocationReview the source code or decompile the CommandHelper class to confirm it uses ProcessBuilder or Runtime.exec with shell invocation (using shell operators or passing commands to a shell).Affected if The code starts a shell process and writes command strings to stdin without parameterized arguments
-
Check for user input pathwaysTrace application traffic or logs to identify if untrusted input can reach the executeCommands method. Review any API endpoints or interfaces that invoke this method.Affected if User-controlled input can be passed to the executeCommands method without validation
The environment is affected if Oinone Pamirs version 7.0.0 is installed and the CommandHelper.executeCommands method is accessible with user-supplied input flowing to it.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation to restrict command strings to expected values, or refactor to use direct process execution with parameterized arguments instead of shell invocation to prevent command injection.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data