CVE-2026-39250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authorization vulnerability exists in Innoshop 0.6.0. After logging into the frontend, an attacker can directly access backend application interfaces, leading to further dangerous operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInnoshop 0.6.0 contains an authorization flaw where authenticated frontend users can directly access backend application interfaces without proper authorization verification. This broken access control allows privilege escalation by enabling standard users to reach administrative endpoints after logging into the frontend.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Innoshop versionLocate the version file or bootstrap file in the Innoshop installation directory (commonly version.php, composer.json, or index.php header) and read the declared version numberAffected if Version is 0.6.0 exactly or falls within the 0.6.x branch
-
Inspect session role validation on backend routesExamine the backend controller files (typically in a /backend or /admin directory) and verify whether each controller action checks the user's role or permission level before executingAffected if Backend controllers lack role-based authorization checks and only rely on frontend session existence
-
Test backend access after frontend authenticationLog in as a regular frontend user, then attempt to access a known backend endpoint (such as /admin, /backend/users, or /backend/settings) using the same session cookiesAffected if Regular authenticated frontend users can access backend administrative interfaces without receiving a 403 Forbidden or redirect to an unauthorized page
-
Review route definitions for access controlInspect the route definition files (routes/web.php or similar) to determine whether backend routes are protected by middleware that verifies administrative roles, not just authenticationAffected if Backend routes only have 'auth' or 'guest' middleware without role-specific guards
You are affected if running Innoshop 0.6.0 and regular frontend users can access backend administrative interfaces without proper role-based authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement server-side authorization checks on all backend routes to verify that the requesting user has appropriate backend privileges before granting access to administrative functions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data