CVE-2026-39432
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Timetics allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Timetics: from n/a through 1.0.53.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Timetics allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The application fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality or data, enabling unauthorized actions. This is a broken access control (OWASP Top 10) vulnerability that likely allows privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Timetics installationLocate the Timetics application installation directory or check running web services for the Arraytics Timetics application banner/version endpointAffected if The application is running but version cannot be determined or is unknown
-
Check application versionReview the application's version information through admin panel, about page, or version file if accessibleAffected if Running version cannot be compared to known fixed versions (no version range provided in CVE data)
-
Verify authorization middleware existsInspect application source code for authorization check functions (e.g., functions that validate user permissions, session roles, or access levels before executing sensitive operations)Affected if No authorization validation functions found before sensitive operations
-
Test for broken access controlAccess various application endpoints with a low-privilege or unauthenticated account and observe if sensitive data or privileged functions are accessible without proper permission validationAffected if Low-privilege or unauthenticated users can access admin functions, view sensitive data, or execute privileged operations
-
Review role-based access control configurationCheck application configuration files or database for role definitions and permission mappings to determine if RBAC is properly enforcedAffected if Roles exist but are not consistently enforced, or permission checks are missing on sensitive endpoints
A user is affected if the Arraytics Timetics application is running without proper authorization checks on sensitive endpoints, allowing unauthorized access to privileged functions or data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, enforce role-based access control (RBAC) consistently across the application, and validate user permissions before executing any privileged operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39432 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39432 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data