CVE-2026-39433
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSubscriber Arbitrary Content Deletion in WPAMS < 49.5.3 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceWPAMS plugin before version 49.5.3 lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber role to delete arbitrary content on the WordPress site. This is a broken access control/IDOR vulnerability where the plugin fails to verify user permissions before executing delete operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if WPAMS plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins, or inspect /wp-content/plugins/ directory for WPAMS folderAffected if WPAMS plugin exists in the plugins directory
-
Determine installed WPAMS versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > WPAMS > View Details, or read version from plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wpams/wpams.phpAffected if Version is lower than 49.5.3 or version cannot be determined (older install)
-
Identify subscriber-level user accountsIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and check for any users with Subscriber roleAffected if At least one Subscriber role account exists on the site
-
Verify delete functionality is accessible to subscribersAttempt to access WPAMS delete endpoints or inspect plugin code for AJAX actions or front-end links available to Subscriber role usersAffected if Delete operations are reachable/performed by authenticated users with Subscriber role without admin-level verification
The environment is affected if WPAMS plugin version is below 49.5.3 AND at least one Subscriber role account exists and can access the plugin's delete functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade WPAMS plugin to version 49.5.3 or later. Until patched, consider restricting or monitoring subscriber-level accounts.
49.5.3 or later
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate WPAMS in the plugin list
- 4. Check the current installed version of WPAMS
- 5. If the installed version is below 49.5.3, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version
- 6. Verify the update completed successfully and the new version is 49.5.3 or higher
- 7. Test that subscribers can no longer delete arbitrary content (confirm the authorization check is now properly enforced)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39433 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39433 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data