CVE-2026-39457
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen exchanging data over a socket, libnv uses select(2) to wait for data to arrive. However, it does not verify whether the provided socket descriptor fits in select(2)'s file descriptor set size limit of FD_SETSIZE (1024). An attacker who is able to force a libnv application to allocate large file descriptors, e.g., by opening many descriptors and executing a program which is not careful to close them upon startup, can trigger stack corruption. If the target application is setuid-root, then this could be used to elevate local privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencelibnv uses select(2) to wait for socket data without validating that the socket descriptor is within FD_SETSIZE (1024). When file descriptors exceed this limit, the fd_set structure overflows, causing stack corruption. On setuid-root applications, this enables local privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.5= 14.3= 14.4= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the FreeBSD base system versionRun 'uname -r' or check /etc/os-release to determine the installed FreeBSD versionAffected if The version is 13.5, 14.3, 14.4, or 15.0
-
Determine if libnv is in useIdentify applications or services that depend on libnv by checking library dependencies with 'ldd' on binaries or reviewing installed packages that may link against libnvAffected if Any application or service built against the system libnv library is in use on an affected FreeBSD version
-
Verify if the application using libnv is setuid-rootCheck the permissions of binaries that depend on libnv using 'ls -la /path/to/binary' to see if the setuid bit is set (indicated by 's' in the owner permissions)Affected if A setuid-root binary that links to libnv is present and executable on the system
-
Check current file descriptor usageRun 'ulimit -n' to see the current file descriptor limit, and 'procstat -f <pid>' or 'ls /proc/<pid>/fd' (if procfs is mounted) to count open file descriptors for processes using libnvAffected if The process using libnv has more than 1024 file descriptors open (exceeding FD_SETSIZE) while running as setuid-root on an affected version
-
Inspect for stack corruption indicatorsReview system logs, audit logs, and core dumps (if generated) for signs of stack corruption or crashes affecting binaries that use libnvAffected if Unexplained crashes or memory corruption occurs in setuid-root processes that depend on libnv on an affected FreeBSD version
A system is affected if it runs FreeBSD 13.5, 14.3, 14.4, or 15.0 with a setuid-root application using libnv that has more than 1024 file descriptors open, causing select(2) to overflow the fd_set structure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade libnv to a version that validates socket descriptors against FD_SETSIZE or refactor to use poll(2)/epoll(7) which lack this limitation.
FreeBSD 15.1 or latest stable branch (15-STABLE)
- Identify all setuid-root programs or daemons on the system that link against libnv by running: find / -perm -4000 2>/dev/null
- Check which of these programs handle network sockets by reviewing their functionality or source code
- If vulnerable setuid programs exist, temporarily remove the setuid bit until patched: chmod -s /path/to/program
- Alternatively, limit the maximum number of open file descriptors for vulnerable processes using ulimit -n or resource limits
- Monitor for any FreeBSD security advisories at security.freebsd.org for the official patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39457 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39457 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data