CVE-2026-39478
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedContributor PHP Object Injection in Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall <= 4.23.87 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePHP Object Injection vulnerability in the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.23.87) allows contributor-level authenticated users to potentially execute arbitrary PHP code via unsafe deserialization of user-supplied data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the Anti-Malware Security plugin is installedCheck your WordPress installation under wp-content/plugins/ for a folder containing 'anti-malware' or 'brute-force' in the name, or use WP-CLI: wp plugin list --status=active --format=csvAffected if The plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main PHP file in the plugin folder and look for the 'Version:' header in the plugin comment block, or query: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name LIKE '%plugin_version%'Affected if The version number shown is 4.23.87 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is active on the siteUse WP-CLI: wp plugin status anti-malware-security (or relevant folder name), or check in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The plugin shows as 'Active' or 'Enabled'
-
Check if contributor-level or lower user accounts existIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review the Role column, or query: SELECT user_id, meta_value FROM wp_usermeta WHERE meta_key = 'wp_capabilities'Affected if Any user has the 'contributor' role (or any role below author) and the plugin is active at version 4.23.87 or lower
You are affected if the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin is active at version 4.23.87 or lower and your site has any user with contributor-level access or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to the latest version (above 4.23.87) to obtain the vendor patch that addresses the unsafe deserialization, or if unable to update, disable the plugin until a fix is available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-39478 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-39478 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data